We live in a world where Ellen DeGeneres is considered a "Covergirl" model.
Posted on 04/18/2017 7:11:06 AM PDT by brucedickinson
The California-based brand revealed its honorees, many of whom were white and skinny. And it didn’t take long for social media users to accuse Victoria’s Secret’s of failing to include women of other ethnicities in its campaign.
“Young, white and thin is what’s sexy according to VS. Where’s the racial diversity? Where’s the size diversity….” one Twitter user wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
To heck with diversity. Every body type and color does not have to be represented in every aspect of society.
Well, to the idiots who bitch about this kind of stuff, they do expect every possible type to be represented in all ways.
We live in a world where Ellen DeGeneres is considered a "Covergirl" model.
Transgender...eff that. I want to see 500 pound women posing with cases of hohos and twinkies! Yowsah!
White lefties love diversity so much, don’t they? That is, until it affects them directly. If you put low income housing right next door to a rich liberal white enclave then you’ll hear these people say things about minorities that would make you think they were part of the Klan.
I don’t get it. I understand that Ellen is “lesbian”, but I don’t get how she’s a cover girl model. Reason being, she goes out of her way to have a mannish appearance.
Why would there be some reason to say that a woman’s beauty includes wanting to appear to be a man?
They took the benches away from outside our mall’s VS store for some reason..........................
Remember the Munsters show of the sixties where the pretty blond girl is shamed and even hidden as “unattractive”? We’re now living that world. Thanks, liberals.
Because no one wants to eat sushi off of an angry transgender bodybuilder
Cleaning the arena after the game is over :P
Um, no, can’t say I ever sit outside a VS store, but thanks for the informative report!
Agreed. What a waste of a beautiful face.
It didn’t take long for the SJWs to get their panties in a wad.
No rational person--except as satire--would suggest a clothing retailer hire models whose appearance would be offensive or unattractive to the expected clientele. The posters attacking Victoria's Secret are either attempting satire, or are simply over the line in pushing the "diversity" foolishness.
I would, of course, agree that "diversity" is as beneficial among lingerie models, catering to a particular look, as it is in elementary schools & small town neighborhoods.
Yeah, guessing the shots of the late Helen Thomas and Madeline Albright in thongs didn’t make the cut, either.
My apologies if that mental imagery caused you to coat your computer screen with coffee (or whatever beverage you were drinking at the time)
What,no Amish?
They need to go after the clothing companies that cater to the larger folks too.....
I mean, that’s a woman pushing 60. Ellen was a very pretty young woman. Not sexy, but easily pretty.
What does diversity have to do with it. Ugly is out. That is universal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.