Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rebelbase

I would think that an air-burst weapon would not be ideal for destroying a tunnel complex. The British in WWII had some bombs that weighed about the same, but the case was made of heavy-wall, high-strength steel. It was meant to plunge through concrete and rock, deep into the earth, and explode afterward. It was called the “earthquake bomb” and was successful against heavily armored, buried bunkers.


86 posted on 04/14/2017 12:33:00 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jim_trent
Oh, you mean this?

This is the Grand Slam bomb, a bomb designed to penetrate a couple of hundred feet below the surface before the bomb exploded. Though its accuracy when used in March 1945 was not the best, its "earthquake effect" from the below-ground explosion was strong enough to bring down nearby structures.

The GBU-43/B MOAB is designed as a large-area surface blast weapon, and would not be used against the North Korean bunkers. Those would require something like the GBU-57A/B MOP bomb, which can penetrate several hundred feet below ground before the bomb detonates.

92 posted on 04/14/2017 2:30:09 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson