Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise
Isn't that tampering with the witnesses by offering influence in their pending lawsuit by the plaintiff?

How can you tamper with a witness who hasn't been identified as a witness ... in a lawsuit that hasn't (yet) been filed?

46 posted on 04/13/2017 4:46:38 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Call it pro-active witness tampering, then... it’s pretty obvious to all that a lawsuit is coming.


53 posted on 04/13/2017 5:01:58 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

There is legal/technical witness tampering and there is de facto witness tampering. Lawyers have been retained. Motions have already been made [the lawyers asked a judge to order the airline to preserve all records]. Unless United settles out of court, it will go to trial. If it does, the passengers will be witnesses.

Given these facts, United is blatantly currying favor with potential future witnesses. It may backfire, though. Dao’s lawyers may use United’s actions to argue against them.


62 posted on 04/13/2017 5:20:10 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught owith pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson