Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ErikJohnsky
NYT FLASHBACK:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/world/middleeast/a-weapon-seen-as-too-horrible-even-in-war.html

A Weapon Seen as Too Horrible, Even in War

By STEVEN ERLANGERSEPT. 6, 2013

EXCERPT

No Western army used gas on the battlefield during the global slaughter of World War II. Hitler, himself gassed during World War I, refused to order its use against combatants, however willing he and the Nazis were to gas noncombatant Jews, Gypsies and others.

21 posted on 04/12/2017 5:27:51 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: maggief
...willing he and the Nazis were to gas noncombatant Jews, Gypsies and others.

By others you mean Christians, priests, nuns, disabled. Millions of them.

37 posted on 04/12/2017 6:21:30 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Great find.

The NYT here both parallels and echoes Spicer’s context, in his use of the term “chemical weapons” -— as opposed to, for example, “chemical execution,” which the U.S. itself has employed.

Excellent find.


44 posted on 04/12/2017 8:25:30 PM PDT by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson