That's a scary proposition, at times.
I've found myself wondering, many times, about whether or not one could prevail in court against government overreach even when that overreach was specifically and explicitly barred by governing Constitution.
The fact that Judge Navarro refused to let copies of the Constitution into the courtroom - and removed one person for having a copy in his pants pocket where it could be seen - speaks loud and clear as to what the jury was supposed to think of the Constitution. Nothing. They were not allowed to see any evidence that we even HAVE a Constitution.
The fact that Judge Navarro refused to let copies of the Constitution into the courtroom - and removed one person for having a copy in his pants pocket where it could be seen - speaks loud and clear as to what the jury was supposed to think of the Constitution. Nothing. They were not allowed to see any evidence that we even HAVE a Constitution.