Not only is your comparison laughable, it’s ridiculous. For you to somehow equate both is a stretch of epic proportions. Forcibly removing a passenger from a plane who refuses to cooperate is not unlawful or immoral.
If those LEOs removed someone unwelcomed in your home, would you also then make this same insane argument?
He wouldn’t vacate the aircraft, what would you do?
You are arguing for a similar perspective. United is going to take some lumps for this, deserved or not, and being defensive about the incident is not productive.
The more I read your arguments, the less I think of you, and the less I think of United.
You don’t read or comprehend well which means I’m wasting my time. You wrongly interpreted what I said. I never suggested that forcibly removing a passenger was unlawful or immoral. I said that beating the passenger was unnecessary and suggested that it may have been unlawful. At this point anything you argue is laughable and ridiculous. You’re making statements about things I didn’t say.
If someone paid to sit in my living room and I asked LEOs to remove him and they proceeded to beat him senseless, I’d be the first to volunteer to testify against the LEOs.
And I’ll repeat myself, I would have forcibly removed him from the aircraft; I wouldn’t beat him senseless.