Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Meet the Press’ Debates If Hillary Lost Because of the Country’s ‘Misogyny’
Newsbusters.org ^ | April 9, 2017 | Nicholas Fondacaro

Posted on 04/09/2017 12:59:59 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Kaslin

The fact she is the most corrupt politician in our history has nothing to do with it.


21 posted on 04/09/2017 1:27:40 PM PDT by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lots of women think Trump is a misogynist but they voted for Hillary...

These people are delusional...


22 posted on 04/09/2017 1:28:01 PM PDT by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

hillary lost because she is a socialist/globalist criminal who thinks herself above the law


23 posted on 04/09/2017 1:29:06 PM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hillary is a tedious, whiny, unlikeable POS. She’s a compulsive liar and lacks insight, judgment, and political skills.

The fact that she is now trying to play her “woman card” in such an annoying way is simply more evidence that she was never fit to be President.


24 posted on 04/09/2017 1:30:13 PM PDT by Enchante (Libtards are enemies of true civilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen

Exactly


25 posted on 04/09/2017 1:31:54 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lbtbell

And voters don’t want a psycho for a president.


26 posted on 04/09/2017 1:33:14 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Well Margaret Thatcher could have never become US President, so you would have wasted your time.


27 posted on 04/09/2017 1:38:08 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
She lost because she is a crappy person.
28 posted on 04/09/2017 1:41:23 PM PDT by Slyfox (Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Who cares if she received more popular votes. She received a lot less electoral votes and those are the votes that count.


29 posted on 04/09/2017 1:41:35 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How can I best put it? Her baggage train stretched from Montauk Point NY to Half Moon Bay CA. I think that had the most bearing with anyone who wasn’t thinking with their emotions.


30 posted on 04/09/2017 1:42:11 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Again it disapeared? Damn cursor is in cahoots with the tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckee
Those who did not vote for Hillary did not do so because they dislike women. They did so because they disliked that woman.

Bingo!!! There are a number of women that I could easily support for president. hillary ain't one of them and never could be.

31 posted on 04/09/2017 1:43:27 PM PDT by Bob (Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

And that is factual on both points


32 posted on 04/09/2017 1:43:44 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

LOL Hillary’s vagina......

clearly she didn’t nail down the vaginal American voters.......

Isn’t it prejudicial and condescending, to just assume that women are eager to vote for a woman candidate for office??


33 posted on 04/09/2017 1:47:07 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

David Brooks is to quote Bugs Bunny “a maroon”. Trump’s masculinity may not be visible at the cocktail parties you’re attending but is still very much alive in America. Brooks has a habit of making these broad sweeping supposedly intelligent statements that are when you break them down completely idiotic. This is one of his finest. Hillary lost because she was Hillary, evil,corrupt and a complete fraud. In spite of what Mr Brooks may think the people in flyover country can recognize this.


34 posted on 04/09/2017 1:47:49 PM PDT by freefdny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well Margaret Thatcher could have never become US President, so you would have wasted your time.

I did not know that. Next thing you’ll tell me is that she’s deceased. /.sarcasm

My point was that it had nothing to do with a candidate being a woman. If I believe it’s the right person, that’s who I’ll vote for.


35 posted on 04/09/2017 1:48:19 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

She lost because she’s a crooked and corrupt career politician who alienated a good half the population by labeling Trump supporters as *racists*, *homophobic*, and *deplorable*.


36 posted on 04/09/2017 1:48:29 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why is it that when I see this word used, it’s by people who do the exactly same things toward men and see no problem with it?

Now while this person states that you don’t have to be guilty of all these to be a misogynist, you don’t have to break any of them to be called one. It’s typically the charge of a women who is very comfortable telling to guy not to get his panties in a bunch over something, in a group setting. Of course that’s intended to belittle him, infer that he’s feminine, a direct attack on his masculinity, and intended to silence him from any discussion where his advocacy might prevail at the consternation of the offending party.

The only way to respond to it, is to call the person on it immediately and let them know you won’t stand for it.

At this point they generally act as if you misunderstood them and it’s all a silly misunderstanding, then once again seeking to belittle you for even thinking such things.

You call them on that too, and make it clear you’ll continue to do it until they accept your participation from the male perspective, even if that cramps their style.


37 posted on 04/09/2017 1:49:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

TODD: And you don’t think — you think another woman could have beaten Donald Trump?

LOWRY: A likable woman could have, yes.

******************************************

And Hillary was NOT likable, which goes to show that it isn’t misogyny.


38 posted on 04/09/2017 1:50:11 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taterjay

“So, there should be no choice in the matter?? Can’t a person vote for who they want, no matter the reason?”

Yes, just like those who voted for Obama to assuage their white guilt.


39 posted on 04/09/2017 1:51:52 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Deportation mayhem is just birthing pains for a new America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

> Hillary Lost Because of the Country’s ‘Misogyny’ <

Ridiculous. Consider if you will this alternative 2016 scenario. It’s Joe Biden (D) vs. Sarah Palin (R).

Would all of those Trump supporters have voted for Biden because of their ‘misogyny’?


40 posted on 04/09/2017 1:51:58 PM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson