Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thank you, Mr Trump! First images of damage at Assad's burnt-out airbase emerge as tearful Syrians
(UK) Daily Mail ^ | April 7, 2017 | Martin Robinson

Posted on 04/07/2017 5:13:47 AM PDT by Zakeet

Complete Headline: Thank you, Mr Trump! First images of damage at Assad’s burnt-out airbase emerge as tearful Syrians cheer US missile raid

These are the first images of the carnage caused by Donald Trump's Tomahawk barrage on al-Assad's badly damaged airbase as Syrians thanked the President for the raid.

US missiles appear to have shattered hangars, destroyed at least nine Syrian jets, weapons and a fuel store, as well as leaving left giant craters in the runway at al-Shayrat military airfield near Homs.

Its radar system and surface-to-air missile defences were also damaged - but crucially the laser-guided missiles avoided the Sarin stores there.


(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Syria; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2banana; alshayrat; assad; cruisemissiles; isis4trump; mccainsproxy; redline; shayrat; syria; terrorism; tomahawks; trump; trumpdoesmccainmove; trumpsyria; trumpsyriastrike
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: Zakeet

Looks like a pile of dirt was hit with some missiles.


41 posted on 04/07/2017 5:48:36 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Not me, gassing women and children comes all to close to Hitler’ methods. And we know DUMBO and the Useless Nations have turned a blind eye to the sarin gas build up in Syria.


42 posted on 04/07/2017 5:49:45 AM PDT by GailA (Ret. SCPO wife: suck it up buttercups it's President Donald Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: captain_dave
Looks to me like very little real damage. Was this a “show” strike for political reasons? I think something else is going on.

I was wondering about this possibility last night. This article's bullet point about a "convoy seen leaving" firms up that suspicion.

43 posted on 04/07/2017 5:50:50 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Russian SAMs are excellent. Strange how they didn’t knock down the slow moving Tomahawk. Hmmm.


44 posted on 04/07/2017 5:51:01 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Cogito ergo sum a conservative pro-American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Listen to the Neocon warmongers sing the praises of this idiocy.


45 posted on 04/07/2017 5:52:23 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oratam

“Carnage?” The usage is like when they say annihilated when at best its decimated.


46 posted on 04/07/2017 5:53:21 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Cogito ergo sum a conservative pro-American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan
T-Bone my FRiend, as someone said, *Obama couldn't lead an army of ants to a picnic*; and here we have a President willing to take a stand. We knew that going in. Have faith FRiend. God willing we will prevail.

All the best
Daffy


47 posted on 04/07/2017 5:53:52 AM PDT by Daffynition ("The New PTSD: Post-Trump Stress Disorder" - The MLN didn't make Trump, so they can't break Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GailA

You know what is worse than gas? Fire. Fire burns when you breath it in, and you should see what it does when it gets on your skin. This arbitrary no-no about which chemical compounds are grounds to invade other countries is bad policy.


48 posted on 04/07/2017 5:53:58 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: vooch

He’s not doing a very good job of it. Our allies will take Raqqa before Assad is even secure in his own location. He’s a genocidal nut and a fraud.


49 posted on 04/07/2017 5:54:47 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Cogito ergo sum a conservative pro-American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Toll

If there is no moral qualms about chemical weapons, why did even Hitler shun their use in WWII?


50 posted on 04/07/2017 5:56:35 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Cogito ergo sum a conservative pro-American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Obama started this a few miles from a Russian base that had been there since the 70s. We better not be in a proxy war, but then again, we have been for decades.


51 posted on 04/07/2017 5:58:48 AM PDT by momincombatboots (pathway to citizenship... Amnesty history repeats. Walling Illegals In wasn't the idea moron!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I woke up this morning wondering . . . HOW EFFECTIVE WAS THE STRIKE AND HOPEFUL THE TARGET WAS COMPLETELY DESTROYED!


52 posted on 04/07/2017 5:59:09 AM PDT by t4texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Because they are bad and nasty. So?

Bad and nasty things happen every single day all over the globe. Is there any of them that you don’t want to stick your nose into?


53 posted on 04/07/2017 5:59:15 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bert
All night, I was thinking. President Xi, is in the next room & Trump is sending missile strikes before dessert.

How cool is that?

*President XI, we have some American made fireworks to show you tonight.* :)

54 posted on 04/07/2017 6:00:10 AM PDT by Daffynition ("The New PTSD: Post-Trump Stress Disorder" - The MLN didn't make Trump, so they can't break Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The Toll

“chemical compounds are grounds to invade other countries is bad policy.”

There won’t be an invasion.


55 posted on 04/07/2017 6:02:14 AM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

I trust the Trump and his intelligence...


I have a hard time trusting the intellegence from the same spooks who spied on Trump, his family and his staff for the past year. They want a war with Russia a bit too much.


56 posted on 04/07/2017 6:08:20 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

On this one sure, I still think it’s really bad policy to set ourselves up as the planets enforcer of what is acceptable violence or not. It is directly apposed to Washington’s wisdom.


57 posted on 04/07/2017 6:08:59 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Or turkey. All bad choices.


58 posted on 04/07/2017 6:11:22 AM PDT by Eagles6 (My weapons are lubricated by liberal tears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

They want a war with Russia a bit too much.


Interestingly, we’ve heard that comment for decades from America hating leftists. Be careful with the company you keep, FRiend.


59 posted on 04/07/2017 6:12:13 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Because Russia has cruise missiles too.


We have had their nuke subs sitting off the coast of the US, too. Most recently in the North East. Before that, in the Gulf.


60 posted on 04/07/2017 6:12:54 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson