A salt-water placebo is probably the most inappropriate control for a vaccine trial.
******************************************
Well, the physician group that studied this disagree. Oh, in case you missed it. They are scientists.
BTW, Guardasil was also fast tracked by the FDA.
I can also list a ton of doctors and scientists that have serious issues with vaccine safety, but it’s not worth my time. You are a scientist, so I’m sure you a capable of looking it up if you are interested.
Although, you seem to be more interested in writing these long synopsis to show everyone what brilliant scientist you are.
However, it’s really just the same spoon fed things I have read a thousand times from the FDA, CDC, and Big Pharma.
Great response, Kara. I forgot to ping you to my other two posts, sorry!
I shake my head in amazement at their arrogance and condescension, as well as their insults.
It seems likely they will never truly “see”, even if they had children of their own that were affected. They will continue to defend it with such religious fervor and “science”!
I don’t think it’s really worth any more time trying to get them to see what is common sense. It’s like talking to a liberal.
Hopefully others who may read the thread will start putting the pieces together as we did. To them I address this (hopefully!) final comment on this thread: Ignore their parting shots and just start reading holistic, natural health news by so many physicians.
Physicians are not scientists, unless they have taken a few years of extra training in research--which these quacks clearly have not. Most physicians know squat about research.
My observation is that physicians slip into quackery when they cannot profit from their skills as physicians. In other words, because they are so bad at their craft that the only way they can make money is by scamming the gullible.
I can also list a ton of doctors and scientists that have serious issues with vaccine safety, but it’s not worth my time.
Although, you seem to be more interested in writing these long synopsis to show everyone what brilliant scientist you are.
Well, thank you for acknowledging my intelligence, but that is not why I write long synopses. I do that because there is a lot of information to impart. And while I do not think there is any getting through to conspiracy theorists like you, I know that there are a lot of people out there who appreciate the fact that I take time to share what I know. Taxpayers paid for all of this knowledge to be stuffed into my head; the least I can do is repay the favor.
However, it’s really just the same spoon fed things I have read a thousand times from the FDA, CDC, and Big Pharma.
It's amazing how consistent the picture is when everyone discussing the issue has a clear understanding of the facts. We've all studied different areas of science to get our PhDs; we work in different institutions; we went to different universities; we live in different areas; we read different literature. Yet in describing the science, we are remarkably consistent. Must be because we are not lying. Compare that to the anti-vax scammery, and you see a different story from every anti-vaxxer. It's like they're just random pulling bits out of their backsides. Or in the cases where they are consistent with their narrative, they are consistent to the point of using the same words and punctuation--as if they are copy-pasting each other--which, again, shows that they have little to no understanding of any pertinent science.