One more thing. DA will undoubtedly put on a Texas Ranger or two to testify about ongoing criminal activity, etc.... and in Texas, when a Ranger testifies against you, it’s like God himself is on the stand, and you are seriously fooked!
That's not "one more thing". It's not a new idea. You are introducing here nothing "new".
But this is where the not need be proven (simply declared to be) insinuation & innuendo comes in. It's worse than having previous convictions brought up (and mention of those most usually can be tossed out due to how they can unduly influence a jury towards guilt for yet some other criminal act).
What is still needed, no matter how you try to avoid it, is evidence there was conspiracy. You've addressed that only by saying (after I had told you "show me where there is conspiracy" or STFU) as I understood you (when you wouldn't STFU) that you'd intimidate and threaten your way to convincing select "roll-over" defendants to testify not to TRUTH, but what you wanted and needed them to say in order to convict some limited number of the accused, INSTEAD.
That type of activity is contrary to what is stipulated by the Constitution of the State of Texas.
In Texas, the Courts and officers of the Court (including prosecuting attorneys) are tasked not to present winning arguments to achieve convictions, or acquittal, but primarily to be finders of truth.
Once truth can be established, then judgement according to law can take place (hopefully) neutrally.
In regards to the pending trials in McClennan County, I have presented no novel legal theories on this thread, despite the putrid mocking you'd given previously in reply. Yet you have just now confessed your own willingness to bend law and legal procedure past breaking point by introducing falsehoods into court upon which convictions sought by prosecution would ultimately rely.
That's been done in Waco before. Here ya' go (were the prosecutors friends of yours?);
By TOMMY WITHERSPOON
Richard Bryan Kussmaul’s three co-defendants testified Wednesday that they gave false confessions at Kussmaul’s capital murder trial 22 years ago because they were coerced by a deputy who threatened them with the death penalty and promises of probation.Kussmaul is serving a life prison term in the 1992 shooting deaths of Leslie Murphy, 17, and Stephen Neighbors, 14, in a mobile home near Moody.
James Edward Long, Michael Dewayne Shelton and James Wayne Pitts Jr. testified at Kussmaul’s 1994 trial in Waco that all four of them raped the girl before Kussmaul shot both victims in the back with a high-powered rifle.
Long, Shelton and Pitts recanted their confessions soon after they were sentenced to 20 years in prison for sexually assaulting the girl.
Long and Pitts both served their full 20-year terms, while Shelton served 17 years before his release. All three testified Wednesday at a hearing ordered by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on the four defendants’ claims that they are innocent of the crime and that DNA evidence excludes all four in the sexual assault.
[snip] Retired State District Judge George Allen, who presided over Kussmaul’s trial in 1994, ruled at a hearing two years ago that if modern DNA testing had been available in 1992, it is “reasonably probable” that Kussmaul and the three co-defendants would not have been convicted. That ruling was affirmed in May 2015 by Waco’s 10th Court of Appeals.
After an appeal by the McLennan County District Attorney’s Office, the Court of Criminal Appeals ordered the trial court to conduct additional hearings in the case, which will continue Thursday.
Attorney Scott Brister, a former justice on the Supreme Court of Texas, is representing Shelton.
“Nothing that happens here today can change what the DNA says, and it says this woman was sexually assaulted and it wasn’t any of these four people,” Brister told the judge. “There is no way the three men who testified committed the sexual assault because the DNA belongs to somebody else.”
Long, Shelton and Pitts told similar stories Wednesday. All charged that former McLennan County Sheriff’s Detective Roy Davis threatened them with the death penalty and coerced them into signing 15-page confessions that he wrote. They charged he tailored their stories to match the evidence and that later, former prosecutor Mike Freeman, who is now a McLennan County court-at-law judge, got them together so their stories would be consistent during their trial testimony against Kussmaul.
(IT GETS WORSE read more at above link)
Well tell me more,
tell me more,
tell me more
I mean was he a heavy doper
or was he just a loser?
He was a friend of yours.