Posted on 03/27/2017 7:33:16 AM PDT by rktman
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said last week that she supports a filibuster to stop the Supreme Court nomination of federal Judge Neil Gorsuch, claiming that he is way outside the mainstream.
We need to have a judge whos kind of acceptable to both sides, Warren said on National Public Radios Morning Edition Friday. Thats the reason theres a 60-vote rule in effect on Supreme Court nominees.
I dont think Neil Gorsuch meets that standard, Warren said. Heres someone read his record.
In every opportunity to choose between corporate interests, big corporations and the little guy employees, women, consumers he always chooses the big corporations, Warren said. And I think that puts him way outside the mainstream of what we need.
So that means you just to be clear you would support a filibuster? Host Rachel Martin asked Warren.
Oh, absolutely, Warren said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
“In every opportunity to choose between corporate interests, big corporations and the little guy employees, women, consumers he always chooses the big corporations, Warren said”
SO he follows the law and the constitution rather than engaging in Marxist class warfare.
“We need to have a judge whos kind of acceptable to both sides,
Here’s a crazy idea Liz, how about a judge that upholds the rule of law?
Warren is a mentally unbalanced LOON who belongs in a mental institution, not in Congress!
I love it when the left starts talking about 'mainstream'. They are so far to the left of the American mainstream that they're in a different time zone. And as far as finding someone who is acceptable to both parties, in our current political atmosphere I think it's safe to say that person does not exist. Period.
Hey Liz, that “main stream” your swimming in is called the Niagara River and unless you head for shore you will end up dead at the bottom of the falls.
Who cares about Warren? Care about the quislings who may not support breaking a dem filibuster (e.g. Collins, McCain and other potential chicken littles steeped in the sauce of supposed tradition) should it happen.
So that means you just to be clear are pretending that nobody heard any of the two days of his testimony at the hearing, or read any op-eds showing how full of crap that accusation is in the past month? Host Rachel Martin did not ask Warren.
After reading this February re-post yesterday http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3538304/posts. . .I believe it is time for President Trump to be looking elsewhere for a nominee.
My take regarding the thread “Does Neil Gorsuch’s Liberal Church Matter?” Yes
IMHO Not questioning Mr. Gorsuch’s salvation, but how can anyone have a personal relationship with God while Sunday after Sunday attending a church with diabolical and liberal leadership and theology.
It he’s not approved by April 1, then he won’t be allowed to sit this session, or so I’ve heard. If so, then it’s Trump’s fault for not pushing to get his hearing much sooner.
What she tells her stupid constituency is that he follows the law.
That is unacceptable to a fake Indian Moonbat.
Oh, the Italian guy.
Wickard v. Filburn .........
LOL, I remember that commercial. Funny thing is, my wife is Italian and she recognized him as a famous Italian actor. I still laugh at the manipulation I saw through even back in the 70’s
She’s right. Gor-suck is to the left of the mainstream.
Iron Eyes Codolini?
Not sure how long it lasted. I remember seeing a plaque in Cambridge on a building, "... Indian College" with dates.
Dems just can't stop shafting people and peoples.
What happened to the Liberals love affair with “Diversity”?
Pocahontas...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.