Posted on 03/26/2017 2:54:56 PM PDT by Controlling Legal Authority
this has nothing to do with net energy.
it is about an alternate source of
...liquid fuel... usable in cars.
the goal is to make OPEC irrelevant.
if coal to liquids
(or any other similar idea)
threw 90% of the energy away,
that would be fine with me,
if the resulting product was cheap enough
to compete with OPEC.
by the way, do you work for Exxon or TIRPO?
just curious!
Yes, per the article. Environmental wackos in CA import it,from Brazil instead of buying it in the American Midwest because it is,some how more “carbon cleaner” if grown from cane sugar in Brazil. Naturally that costs more to feel better about it.
So we,should ban cotton, tobacco, etc. any thing that grows that isn’t meant to be eaten is verboten?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.