Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomStar3028

Indeed animals are for eating not pets.


32 posted on 03/26/2017 12:27:40 PM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Vaduz
"Indeed animals are for eating not pets."

Then we're both in agreement than you should not have pets.

34 posted on 03/26/2017 12:30:52 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Ted Kennedy burns in hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Vaduz

“Indeed animals are for eating not pets.”

Oh please.

I’ll bet you think that is actually a “conservative” position, don’t you?

Freaking nutcase.


51 posted on 03/26/2017 12:42:48 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Vaduz

Well, the ex-President, Hussein Obama would agree that dogs
are for eating. - DUB got one of my chicken strips and a
biscuit and gravy & potatoes for lunch. She left me with
enough - 2 big strips & a container of potatoes & gravy.
I delight in spoiling my animals. (The tender mercies of the
wicked are cruel. They mistreat their beasts.) He needs his
fat butt kicked all the way up to the road.


101 posted on 03/26/2017 3:19:56 PM PDT by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson