Replies

I tried to add most of those who expressed interest on what might have gone down yesterday evening with the JJ show not bringing on Cameron. It doesn’t really matter at this point as JJ is not part of this story but rather only one megaphone among many to come.

George Webb comments today that Montgomery wasn’t shown on JJ likely due to his prior history of bad check-writing coming out in the pre-show vetting:

https://youtu.be/QPjiLupOmgE?t=499

As I commented earlier, whatever Clapper/Brennan had on Montgomery only served to provide them a means of blackmailing him or otherwise controlling him. He had expertise in cyber hacking that they needed and any checkered material they had on him or framed him with only made them think he couldn’t run away too far.

It’s very similar to dirty probation officers using parolees to do things for them such as opening mail offsite (yes, that indeed happens). People that are caught up in criminal frame-ups are very hesitant to go against those holding their freedom.

Montgomery obviously had the expertise Clapper/Brennan wanted and needed otherwise they wouldn’t have hired him back.

IN ANY EVENT, Montgomery’s past has no bearing on the data. The sheer volume of the data along with recorded phone calls and all manner of other verifiable points of fact make Montgomery and his past irrelevant to the case. The people targeted and recorded in the data can vouch for its authenticity and as they are informed and they step forward to testify, the lawsuits will fly. Therefore, the distraction with Montgomery’s compromised past is nothing in the grander view of where this goes.

Where this goes is in the hands of a federal court where Freedom Watch has obtained immunity for Montgomery from federal judges. Copies of the data have been turned over to Comey and Freedom Watch is waiting on whether Nunes will call on Montgomery to testify. Nunes will likely think it too hot to handle as he does not appear to have the backbone to crawl under the fire that Montgomery is bad news even if this bad news was a frame-up. Nunes should realize that life is temporary and that in war you have to lay your life on the line. But I don’t think he has the right stuff. Any patriot would know that Montgomery is not the issue here. It is the data that is the issue.

IN ANY EVENT again, Freedom Watch has given Nune’s lawyers notice that they will go public with this, meaning a lawsuit will be filed. That means Nunes can either devote his current insignificant life to serving his country or dine with the establishment.

I’ll repeat an earlier comment made to a Fox segment with link provided by Whenifhow:

https://youtu.be/qQcC7nivswc?t=38

One seemingly minor quote has to do with having evidence of NSA eavesdroppers joking and bragging how they listened in on their boyfriends, girlfriends to see if they were cheating and so forth. What that means in a microcosm of this entire case is that there are people that will testify that they indeed did have those conversations when they hear them if they haven’t already heard them. That in itself breaks this wide open. Because the unsophisticated and uninformed among us will identify strongly with listening for cheating on mates. That strikes home for most Americans, not because they cheat or have been cheated on, but because they understand it.

Seemingly ‘’little’ things like this matter enormously in the popular culture.