Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kamala Harris leaves no doubt that she has the stupidest reason for voting against Gorsuch
americanthinker.com ^ | 3/25/2017 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 03/25/2017 7:39:29 AM PDT by rktman

Al Franken made a strong case for himself during the Gorsuch confirmation hearings, but in a last-minute surge, his Democrat Senate colleague Kamala Harris has stolen the crown (or dunce cap) from his grasp. The magnitude of this achievement should not be underestimated: after all, Franken is a man whose distinctive competence is beclowning himself.

With this tweet, Senator Harris has achieved some sort of immortality:

Judge Gorsuch has consistently valued legalisms over real lives. I won't support his nomination. https://t.co/7SLAOI6MXx — Kamala Harris (@SenKamalaHarris) March 24, 2017

Brian Anderson aptly sums up the message here: “Kamala Harris says she won’t be voting to confirm Gorsuch because he bases his decisions on the law instead of feelings.”

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; calibfornia; doh; stupidpeople
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: ifinnegan

There are any number of good reasons not to have her as the D nominee, but the Ds already have CA in the bag .. they probably want someone from a flippable state. I have it!!! Let’s run Tim Kaine. A sure winner for them.


41 posted on 03/25/2017 9:01:47 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

42 posted on 03/25/2017 9:05:43 AM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Oh, me. If only we ran the justice system based on our feelings then all would be wonderful for all.

In fact, it would greatly resemble Stalin's Union of Soviet Socialist Republics!

43 posted on 03/25/2017 9:12:43 AM PDT by Gritty (The whole leftist platform is about putting us down and keeping us down - Kurt Schlicter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Its hard to find a replacement for a Senator who was dumb as a box of rocks.. but California done it again.


44 posted on 03/25/2017 9:20:14 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

Death Row Inmates cant wait until she is President.
Then they all get commutations of their sentences.

She made her name protecting a gangbanger from DR, a great many here applauded her for her courage in not seeking a death penalty for a police officer that was gunned down with an AK47. The perp was earning his stripes in the gang.

Now she has taken her act to Washington. GO figure.


45 posted on 03/25/2017 9:24:22 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Reason number 202,579 I’m delighted that we fled SoCal in 2015 and moved to E Tennessee.


46 posted on 03/25/2017 9:28:59 AM PDT by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
It wasn't that a conservative wasn't in the race for U.S. Senate in California to replace the mentally incompacitated Barbara Boxer, it was that there was no Republican. The choice was between two women on the far Left.

The only positive thing is that California is and remains an active case study of a one-party state run by strong-arm totalitarian Leftists, with the outcome visible to all who care to look.

47 posted on 03/25/2017 9:30:09 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

She’ll first have to kiss Maxine Waters’s feet (three feet up and to the rear) first.


48 posted on 03/25/2017 9:48:27 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Kamala Harris is a far left Marxist. View everything she does in that light. They fast tracked her from San Francisco District Attorney to US Senator from California, which she will probably hold until death.

She holds the most progressive score in the Senate, at 100% for crucial votes and 98% lifetime.

She is a commie, pure and simple. Treat here that way. Everything she says might as well come straight from Maxine Waters, or Nancy Pelosi, etc.

Progressive scores for Senate here:

http://progressivepunch.org/scores.htm?house=senate


49 posted on 03/25/2017 9:57:37 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The GOP will see the light, because Trump will make them feel the heat.it is hugh and series)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

Yes, because California is a one-party Democrat commie liberals state. She went straight from SAN FRANCISCO Attorney General, to California AG, to US Senate. They fast tracked her.

She left of Al Franken. They could not get her into the US Senate fast enough.

All you need to know is that she was San Francisco AG. Every office holder in San Francisco is a rank Marxist. Every single one. She would be best buds with Valerie Jarrett. She probably is.


50 posted on 03/25/2017 10:00:54 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The GOP will see the light, because Trump will make them feel the heat.it is hugh and series)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billorites

No, not dumb. Think complete Marxist. She is left of Elizabeth Warren and Dick Durbin.


51 posted on 03/25/2017 10:01:31 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The GOP will see the light, because Trump will make them feel the heat.it is hugh and series)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“As U.S. senators, we have an obligation to also examine a nominee’s legal approach and ask whether he or she considers the impact of those decisions on our society and the daily lives of our people.”

No, Ms. Harris. You only need to be assured that he will uphold the Constitution. Period.


52 posted on 03/25/2017 10:19:56 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Yes ifinigan. I am from CA until I escaped. She is being groomed to run for President. She is bat&*&^%t crazy.


53 posted on 03/25/2017 11:15:13 AM PDT by pugmama (Ports Moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
This woman was the attorney general of California. The attorney general.

I have two friends who recently retired from the California Attorney General's office and worked for her a couple of levels down the organization. They tell me she is personable but a shallow, slow and unclear thinker. Dense enough to not know what she doesn't know. Propped up by career staff and political handlers. In other words, meets all qualifications for a Democrat senator, as evidenced by this insane perspective on Gorsuch.

54 posted on 03/25/2017 11:34:19 AM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
I must unfortunately agree. As I posted a while ago:

It's going to have to be Kamala Harris. It's almost like Obama with female plumbing and other enhancements.

They will think she can easily grab Obama's third term after an unfortunate 4-year interruption by an "illegitimate" President.

55 posted on 03/25/2017 11:43:17 AM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

This is why if women ran the world, it would be a far worse place to live in. Tere is no consistency in basing decisions on subjective, ever changing emotions. It would be a much more crazy, unpredictable, impossible to navigate without trouble, place to attempt to live.


56 posted on 03/25/2017 11:53:30 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Third - she is a socialist.


57 posted on 03/25/2017 11:54:06 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rktman

” “Kamala Harris says she won’t be voting to confirm Gorsuch because he bases his decisions on the law instead of feelings.””

See, you just START with this quote, so we can move on.


58 posted on 03/25/2017 12:53:36 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

” “Kamala Harris says she won’t be voting to confirm Gorsuch because he bases his decisions on the law instead of feelings.””

See, you just START with this quote, so we can move on.


59 posted on 03/25/2017 12:53:37 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

OOPS! well it was worth repeating.


60 posted on 03/25/2017 12:54:23 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson