Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks like a nice ship to me.

So they buy American missiles for this ship. Not a bad choice, America has lots of experience at this.

Just saying.


8 posted on 03/24/2017 9:32:57 PM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cba123
Well they have no immediate plans to acquire any missiles for the Mk41 launchers. (The separate Sea Ceptor launchers for the CAAM anti-air missiles will be loaded).

But fitting the Mk41 anyway still makes some sense.

For one thing, Australia's SEA 5000 program does not consider the Mk41 optional, and if BAE Systems doesn't come up with a completed design by the end of 2017, they will lose to either Fincantieri or Navantia.

BAE needs to realise for future export prospects the Australian order is the more important one: It's larger, more imminent, and specifies a more advanced ship (with a proper AESA radar system instead of that crappy little Brit Artisan rotator.)


10 posted on 03/24/2017 10:02:54 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (I never ever set out to make anyone feel safe. - S E Hinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

Meanwhile, in America, the primary plant for manufacturing military explosives is run by BAE systems


16 posted on 03/25/2017 4:54:54 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Hillary is Ameritrash, pass it on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson