Or were they just in a hurry?
Part of the law on trade secrets is based upon how well “protected” the secret was.
Considering what Hillary did with the emails and server, could anyone claim that it was “well protected”?
Don’t know much about the Russians, but Podesta’s gave his password out to a phishing email - ‘p@ssw0rd’
My odds are 75% disgruntled Bernie supporters.
could be numerous different groups
and/or governments
Of course they were Russian. Look, they used a famous Russian spyware tool. (which the CIA has according to wikileaks) And look, they used some Cyrillic letters in their code and did the work at 3am, during normal work hours in Russia (Like the vault 7 document instructed CIA people to carefully do when impersonating a Russian).
And last, just for fun. The intel community says its Russia.
Can anyone think of a single time the CIA was honest with the American people? Even once?
WMDs, Benghazi, Libya, rendition, 5 eyes, Saudi connections to 9/11, dope smuggling into Mena Arkansas to fund the Contras, golden triangle heroin, the French connection, COINTELPRO, testing of LSD on people without permission, killing of JFK, missile gap, bomber gap, Fast and Furious, deals with Sinaloa, Syria Egypt and Libya were all natural indigenous uprisings, we don’t collect the communications of the American people in bulk... the list is endless.
If they tell you something, the opposite is always true. This rule never fails me.....ever.
> Who says the hackers were Russian? [] The FBI does, and so do several U.S. intelligence agencies
Based on a report provided by Crowdstrike, NOT independent investigation. The DNC refused access.
Why does Crowdstrike’s Alperovitch refer to APT 28 and APT 29 as “Fancy Bear” and “Cozy Bear”? Why use these colorful names rather than the accepted technical names? (APT stands for Advanced Persistent Threat).
Is Alperovitch selling an idea, supporting a narrative?
No, but thanks for asking.
Wanna see EVERY online photo of them..?
That's ALL of them.
That's VERY spy-centric behavior, or it's the trail remaining after someone pretty professional cleaned-up after them.
Not that it has to be a State actor by any means given the shoddy security they and Hillary had and given the Muzzies running so much of the Congressional systems and who were probably selling access to anyone with cash in hand.
Are we talking about DNC computers ( the ones Wasseman Schultz used to sabotage Bernie Sanders and give Hillary the nomination, the ones handed over to the Pakistani spies) or Hillarys computer or podesta’s computer ??? Everyone is just parroting the same garbage over and over about “ computers” ...
For the FBI to flatly state that the Russians hacked the e-mails without actually having inspected the machines is poor, especially with the implications for the current effort to destroy and claim our president is illegitimate. They were denied access by the Democrats, and are using the word of a company, hired by the Democrats and paid by the Democrats to further the Democrat charges. Who owns CrowdStrike? What affiliation do its executives have with the Democrats? What association do they have with the Clintons or the Clinton Foundation? There are a lot of questions that should be asked and answered.
FoP - Friends of Podesta
CIA should be disbanded and their duties given to military intelligence like it was before. Different mindset, more nationalistic than globalist.
itgate ping
The whole Dem universe of hate is falling apart.
Their schemes are collapsing, no one is taking them seriously, there are no Russians.
Obama was spying and lying at a Niagra Falls type level.
Everything Trump said is true, and everything the DNC and the MSM say are lies.