It’s the ‘constitutional option’ when ‘rats do it, though it’s found nowhere in the Constitution.
It’s only the ‘nuclear option’ when quaking GOP cucks are faced with doing it. And they use the expression themselves. They allow the ‘rats to make the rules and terminology.
Zactly.
They’ll then reply “But, Harry Reid is no longer in the Senate”.
“True but, as a long time leader and strategist, he expected Hillary to win and his tactic in process and legacy was to put a democratic Congress and president in position to win on issues important to then by leaving a simple majority of 51 votes to ensure they would prevail.
Well, he left his will basically intestate and we are the inheretents of his legacy.
We intend to pick up were he left off, to insure we make progress in representing the people’s work.”
Something like that. (Hope I hear Levine say something like that in the next week and the laugh his ass off on air...
LOL
“This is the heritage of Harry Reid, a good man and esteemed senator, who sought to improve the efficiency of the senate and we would, as inheritants, be irresponsible not to continue his legacy”.
Present it in a way that cannot be defined as mere obstinate ancestry or a device of friction.
Praise him for his foresight to improve the efficiency of the Senate.