To: ColdOne
LOL. So some of the priciest real estate on Earth is now a “sanctuary city.” Unless the ordinance requires each homeowner to put aside a quarter acre for a couple migrant tents, I’d call this simple virtue signaling in the extreme.
3 posted on
03/21/2017 9:02:28 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Opinionated Blowhard
It’s political onanism to the extreme...................
7 posted on
03/21/2017 9:09:50 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
You don’t understand. The ordinance is to protect the help.
8 posted on
03/21/2017 9:09:53 AM PDT by
D_Idaho
("For we wrestle not against flesh and blood...".)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
It’s virtue signaling for sure, but there’ll be a real world cost to it — a higher crime rate. ....which of course the residents will blame on Trump and the GOP rather than their own guilt-ridden PC.
9 posted on
03/21/2017 9:10:54 AM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: Opinionated Blowhard
They won’t even let people who don’t live there, walk on their so-called “private beaches”.
This is a joke. Do they want pan handlers hanging around Nobu?
38 posted on
03/21/2017 2:02:30 PM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson