Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Just on Trump, though? Cuz if they were surveilling Trump for Obama, why not other US citizens deemed a political threat? My bet: Trump wasn’t the only cit being surveilled for political reasons.


10 posted on 03/21/2017 6:12:22 AM PDT by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla

Of course!
Obama had everybody surveilled, that is Valerie Jarrett did..................


12 posted on 03/21/2017 6:14:13 AM PDT by Red Badger (Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla

“Just on Trump, though? Cuz if they were surveilling Trump for Obama, why not other US citizens deemed a political threat? My bet: Trump wasn’t the only cit being surveilled for political reasons.”

Since the Wikileaks disclosure of a very small fraction of what they have, my bet: they have large files on every single current and former Representative, Senator, Judge, top aides, lobbyists at the federal level, and since harvested and storing that data is automatic, it wouldn’t surprise me if they have the same for state, and probably even county level officials too. I honestly think people have a hard time comprehending how enormous this surveillance network is, and how easy it is for them to do. The limiting factor is data storage space, and how to analyze the mountains of info.


62 posted on 03/21/2017 9:01:12 AM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson