I’m deeply concerned that the “replacement” would be _owned_ by the Right, like it or not, and vilified & attacked by the Left relentlessly & mercilessly until they can replace it with single-payer. ANY “replacement” _will_fail_, and do so with the intention of taking the Right with it.
We don’t want a replacement.
We can’t afford to be tied to something which is un-Constitutional to begin with.
We want the government OUT of the healthcare business. Some regulation is reasonable to prevent gratuitous problems, as a matter of “interstate commerce” issues and “public welfare” problem-prevention - but that would require _allowing_ “interstate commerce” to begin with (inexplicably banned now), and there’s a systemic misinterpretation of “welfare” as “redistribute” instead of “do no harm”.
NO REPLACEMENT.
REPEAL ONLY, AND FIX THE OBVIOUS OBSTACLES.
This silliness was already shot down. Ignoring the Parliamentarian equates to killing the Filibuster and conservative Senators are not going to support that, for excellent reason.
So this article is safely ignored.