Posted on 03/18/2017 4:45:29 PM PDT by NCjim
Again just like Clinton servers. This laptop should have its data backupped on to some government system somewhere
Vincent Rutuelo.
Director of safety and security Vincent Rutuelo began working as Poly's first security director this summer, and his impressive work is already visible on campus.
"We needed a security professional," said Steve Andersen, associate head of school. "Vinny is a past New York City police officer
https://www.polyprep.org/page/parents?pk=312756
//
A teacher from Poly Prep Country Day School found another bag containing papers on her front porch and she turned them over to school security. Poly Prep’s head of security, a retired NYPD cop, (Vincent Rutuelo) determined they were Secret Service and notified Agent Argentieri Friday morning, sources said. http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/laptop-trump-tower-floor-plans-stolen-secret-service-article-1.3001078
Obviously, the papers personally identified Agent Argentieri.
Did Argentieri even know of the theft prior to Rutuelo notifying her? (Presuming the agent is not involved.)
Along with the security card used to access the computer.
“Where the get these dumb cluck’s from?”
From the masses of affirmative action-types waiting for jobs to which they are entitled. This is workfare on a massive scale - a wealth transfer from taxpayers to “disadvantaged minorities”...
Now that makes sense.
It’s a motor cycle. She left her laptop in a backpack on a motorcycle at night. Nothing suspicious at all about that.
Has this idiot SS agent been arrested and in prison as yet? If not, why not?
Why was the bag(s) dumped on a doorsteps and not in the harbor?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vincent-j-rutuelo-4252134a
Private Investigator – Licensed in New York
New York City Fire Department Certificate of Fitness Alarm System Maintenance - S95
Professional Security Management, John Jay College
Certified in Homeland Security – Level III
FEMA Certificates in National Incident Management Systems (NIMS), Emergency Support Functions, Introduction to Incident Command Systems (IS100), Active Shooter (IS907)
Certificate of Training in Weapons of Mass Destruction – Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear
Latent Print Examination
Crime Scene Investigation
Advanced Narcotics Investigations Course
Crime Prevention and Security Analysis Investigations
Executive Protection / Dignitary Security
Labor Relations Course, Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association
CCTV, Audio / Video Surveillance
Wire / Wireless Intrusion Monitoring Systems
AED & CPR
= ASIS, Member
= NYM Infragard, Member
Licensed to Carry Concealed Firearm in New York
—
School history ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poly_Prep_Country_Day_School
Child Abuse Claims
The school was the subject of a federal lawsuit filed in the Eastern District Court in Brooklyn in 2009 centering on the sexual assault of students by Philip Foglietta, the head football coach from 1966 to 1991. The suit settled for an undisclosed amount in December 2012. A 2004 state suit against the school had been dismissed due to the statute of limitations, but U.S. District Court Judge Frederic Block subsequently ruled that portions of the suit could proceed in federal court because administrators may have lied about when they learned of the abuse. Plaintiffs’ attorney Kevin Mulhearn cited the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act in alleging that past and current administrators engaged in a coverup of the abuse.[1] The school acknowledged in 2002 that it had received “credible allegations that such abuse occurred at Poly Prep.”[2] Poly chairman Scott Smith’s younger brother Philip never went to college and slid into multiple addictions. According to the lawsuit, he was sexually assaulted hundreds of times.[3] Published reports have compared the abuse and alleged coverup to a similar scandal at Pennsylvania State University.[4] In March 2012 the international law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman joined the plaintiffs on a pro bono basis.[5] On September 19, 2012, new allegations connecting Foglietta and Jerry Sandusky surfaced.[6] On December 27, 2012, Poly Prep and the plaintiffs announced a settlement of the lawsuit. On February 21, 2014 the school issued what the Wall Street Journal called “a sweeping apology” for the abuse and the school’s failure over the decades to respond appropriately when victims revealed their abuse.[7]
Finding out the neighborhood is getting complicated. Have to pull in other sources and seach other names & records.
bbl hopefully with some info. :-)
The only way you would KNOW there was nothing sensitive on the laptop and the msm lied about it, was if you personally had seen what was on the laptop.
So my question is, why are you “debunking” something you cannot possibly know about?
At least one article says a “2015 Bajaj”. Subaru Baja stopped being made years ago, according to a comment on FR.
I'm saying that the media has no way to know what was on it... so all the speculation about it having Hillary stuff on it are nothing more than wild speculation... unless the media has the laptop and can see what's on it.
We can guess as to what might have been on it... and floor plans of Trump tower would seem logical if this agent was assigned to that building. Hillary investigation material? That doesn't even make sense.
Virtually all the media that's reporting this tidbit doesn't attribute that to any source other then other media reporting it. My guess is some blogger or someone inserted that in order to spice up the story and generate clicks.
This is how the fake news works. Someone, some reporter or blogger makes something up... then, all the media jumps on the bandwagon and says "It's been reported that....".
> Virtually all the media that’s reporting this tidbit doesn’t attribute that to any source other then other media reporting it.
Unnamed police sources, not media reports
Why would the Secret Service tell "unnamed police sources" anything specific about what was on the laptop?
Try to use a little bit of critical thinking in these situations.
Admit your erroneous claim that media is reporting on media.
You also should try using a little critical thinking yourself.
Why? That's exactly what's happening. One paper starts it with the good old "unnamed source", which is completely useless and all the other media says "its been reported that...".
What is your purpose in this “debunking”, we wonders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.