Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mean Daddy

I am frankly disturbed by the number of people here who took this at face value. This was a crude tweet, unlike most corporate communications. While a former Obama spokesman is now working there, no corporate officer in their right mind is going to blatantly attack a President.

McDonald’s (unlike Ben and Jerry’s) does not have a reputation for public activism. They likely fund leftist groups to buy off bad publicity, but they don’t have a history of taking public political stands.

When we see a story like this, our first reaction should be skepticism and to reserve judgement. It could be a rogue employee or, as looks likely in this case, a hacker. Even if a hacker, they could be trying to target McDonald’s by riling up Trump’s supporters.

Don’t take things at face value, look at the context.


125 posted on 03/16/2017 8:02:48 AM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: drop 50 and fire for effect
I am frankly disturbed by the number of people here who took this at face value. This was a crude tweet, unlike most corporate communications. While a former Obama spokesman is now working there, no corporate officer in their right mind is going to blatantly attack a President.

As director of communications at McDonalds, I suspect that Robert Gibbs has full and total access to the corporate twitter account and clears every tweet. My guess is that he thought he was on a private twitter (one of his own) and got drunk and posted this on the corporate account by accident.

As long as Robert Gibbs remains the head of communications for McDonalds, I would have to consider that that tweet is the official position of the company.

130 posted on 03/16/2017 8:07:58 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect

Yeah, I can’t imagine any CEO thinking that this, in any way, benefits shareholders - to whom they are accountable.

I think this has to be a hack. If, due to some strange mental episode, was in fact done by the corp leadership deliberately it’s just suicide.

They certainly can’t let this go if it’s a hack, they need to respond immediately.


160 posted on 03/16/2017 8:35:32 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson