To: Carl Vehse
....Reeves legitimately used deadly force to stop the violent threat.What violent threat? Popcorn?
I predict the turgidity level, about shooting another human, in this thread is going to be strong.
6 posted on
03/16/2017 6:34:27 AM PDT by
raybbr
(That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
To: raybbr
What violent threat? Popcorn? You know that's assault and battery, right? If the guy is pulling his arm back again should the victim wait to see what happens and hope for the best?
His wife was with him, so he's not just defending himself.
To: raybbr
yeah the popcorn threat is about as credible as the cops attacking, and ultimately killing a slow minded man holding a pepsi plastic bottle in his hand.....not....buying....it....
one reason I don't think everybody should be allowed to carry.....too many people shoot on instinct and tragedies follow...
34 posted on
03/16/2017 8:52:18 AM PDT by
cherry
(<_)
To: raybbr
As THE ARTICLE STATED the attack on an elderly man made it “a violent attack” and a potential felony.
36 posted on
03/16/2017 8:56:48 AM PDT by
Shimmer1
(Happiness is the spiritual experience of living with love, grace and gratitude.... David Waitley)
To: raybbr
If you think it’s only about popcorn, then you aren’t very bright.
47 posted on
03/16/2017 9:55:04 AM PDT by
gogeo
(When your life is based on a false premise...you are indeed insane.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson