Parents who refuse to vaccinate should then be strictly liable for damages from anyone infected by their children. That seems fair.
Parents who refuse to vaccinate should then be strictly liable for damages from anyone infected by their children. That seems fair.
**********************************************
The problem with that statement is that it’s the vaccine children that are doing the infecting. The CDC clearly states that if you have a immune compromise person living in your house( Cancer, Aids, ect.), don’t give your children certain vaccines that are made from live viruses.
Tuberculosis (BCG),
Oral Polio Vaccine,
Measles,
Rotavirus,
Yellow Fever.
Almost every outbreak in recent history has been from children that were vaccinated.
The MMR vaccine effectiveness is 88% with two doses. This means that if 100 vaccinated people are exposed to the mumps, 12 will still become sick.
In December, the CDC said that most of the individual state outbreaks had been occurring among vaccinated people.
You want to hold parents liable?
If you are all for accountability you would probably want to see the manufacturer of the vaccine liable for the product they create and the damages they do, wouldn’t you? Why are we the taxpayers on the hook for the damages?