Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mewzilla

I really don’t think this lower limit will save any lives. At some point, human nature kicks in, and the thought process is ‘screw it, one drink already put me over the limit, so I might as well have another’...so who knows, the lower limit may actually be counter-productive.

At some point, the lower limits have to be recognized for what they really are - revenue producers.

If this was really about saving lives, states wouldn’t have diversion programs where you could buy your way out of a dui. Keep the limit realistic and eliminate diversions - that would be a pro-life stance. Instead states are pushing for the dui version of a speed trap.


125 posted on 03/12/2017 9:44:13 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: lacrew

If Utah puts 0.05 into place, other states will fall in line.
This happened years ago when it was 0.10, some states went 0.08 and then it became 0.08 for everyone or lose Fed funding.

Alcohol is the new Tobacco. High revenue generator.

No worries...people will enjoy themselves, out and about, high as a kite with their legal/illegal drugs - without a breathalyzer fear in the world./sad sarc


127 posted on 03/12/2017 10:24:54 AM PDT by libertarian27 (FR Cookbooks - On Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson