Did I miss the part about the underwater mechanic shop that swapped the engine?
Yeah. I suppose you think those dozens of mis-matched cuts on the engine came from one engine rolling around in the water.
And I suppose you believe that an intense fire destroyed the engine that was in that plane (as claimed by the NTSB and Pratt & Whitney based on the engine they were given to examine), even though the pilot is seen feeding more fuel into the engine which is an absolute no-no if there’s a fire, and the engine on the video is seen/heard through audio analysis to be running normally until about a second after splashdown (when water filled the engine) and the gauge shows a fuel delivery rate consistent with those other two clues on the video - all showing that there was no engine failure but a normally-running engine right up to splashdown.
Oh well. I can’t make you see what you refuse to see. Just like the folks who said it was crazy that the opposition’s computers were hacked and all the other stuff that the CIA has been doing all along. Those who have seen it first-hand knew it was going on, but those on the sidelines had the luxury of laughing at us because they either weren’t engaged enough to be a threat to the regime or were covertly part of the regime.
The “cool kids” were “embarrassed” by those who are now shown to have been speaking the truth on the CIA crap, and the Fuddy hoax won’t be far behind. All in the right time.