Posted on 03/05/2017 4:19:17 AM PST by HomerBohn
Democratic leaders like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are responsible for the huge lies that Russia hacked into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and our election. There is no evidence that anything happened between Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russians. Now, we’ve uncovered that the Democrats secretly paid for the Russian hacking lies to be sold to the American people. This is going to blow your mind.
To understand all the hoopla behind the Russian conspiracy, we have to start at the beginning. The Russian story started with the Democratic National Committee (DNC) reporting that they had been hacked during their convention last year. From that hacking, we found out Bernie Sanders had been thrown under the bus by the DNC in favor of Hillary Clinton. But, who really hacked the DNC? It wasn’t Russia; it was a hacker calling himself Guccifer 2.0.
Politico, a left-wing source, reported back in September that it was Guccifer 2.0 that hacked the DNC. “The hacker persona Guccifer 2.0 has released a new trove of documents that allegedly reveal more information about the Democratic National Committee’s finances and personal information on Democratic donors, as well as details about the DNC’s network infrastructure,” the source said.
So, where did the Russian hacking story come from? The answer should piss you off. It originated from a private security company called “Crowdstrike,” and that company was paid over $267,000 dollars by the Democratic National Committee. But, here’s the real kicker: it’s Crowdstrike that says Guccifer 2.0 is a Russian Government spy, and that is laughable!
Here’s why: Justice.gov says, “Marcel Lehel Lazar, 44, of Arad, Romania, a hacker who used the online moniker ‘Guccifer,’ was sentenced today to 52 months in prison for unauthorized access to a protected computer and aggravated identity theft.” So, Guccifer is a Romanian, and there is absolutely no evidence that he was working for Russia. If that was true, don’t you think, when he was sentenced to 52 years in prison, that would have come out?
Marcel Lehel Lazar, 44, of Arad, Romania, is Guccifer 2.0. Sentenced to 52 years for hacking, there was no evidence he was working for Russia.
Not the FBI, CIA, Department of Justice, or any American intelligence agency ever proved Russia hacked anything. All of this crap about Russia is coming from a report from this private security firm “Crowdstrike” which was contracted by Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats.
In fact, the mind blowing part of this whole fake conspiracy is that the FBI and DHS give zero forensic proof of any hacking. Instead, they say they are relying on Crowdstrike. Let’s go over that again in case it’s not sinking in — the FBI and DHS report nothing except that this private security firm Crowdstrike, paid by the DNC, says this hacker Guccifer 2.0 is a big bad Russian.
The Hill reported on the FBI and DHS joint report on the alleged hacking, saying, “But security experts say that the document [FBI and DHS joint report] provides little in the way of forensic ‘proof’ to confirm the government’s attribution. Private security firms — like CrowdStrike, who investigated the DNC breach — went much further, they [FBI, DHS] say.”
Breitbart’s Lee Stranahan confirms that it was Crowdstrike and the Democrats who made up the Russian hacking story.
Here’s what Crowdstrike says, “CrowdStrike stands fully by its analysis and findings identifying two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network in May 2016. On June 15, 2016, a blog post to a WordPress site authored by an individual using the moniker Guccifer 2.0 claimed credit for breaching the Democratic National Committee. This blog post presents documents alleged to have originated from the DNC.”
So, Guccifer 2.0 is Russian intelligence? Did he work for Vladimir Putin, too? This is all a fake conspiracy that the Democrats paid Crowdstrike to “find.” This false narrative was concocted with one endgame, and that is to take out President Donald Trump. The Democrats are using the paranoia around the fake Russian hacking story to make anyone who spoke to a Russian diplomat seem nefarious.
It’s a pack of lies, and now that you know the truth, we must spread it far and wide. Don’t let these scumbags in the Democratic Party do any more damage. We all know the mainstream media will never report these facts, so it’s up to us patriotic Americans to make sure the liars go down in flames and are exposed as traitors to everything they vowed to uphold.
Might be? LOL. I suppose that depends on how one defines "sedition," but Google is leftist, anti-American to the core.
Enemies domestic ALERT! DEPOPULATING them from politics may not be enough.
Some criminals never stop unless incarcerated or eliminated.
CW2.0
Articles that purport to unravel complexity and reveal the truth lose ALL credibility, IMO, when they make such mistakes. The bane of Internet "reporting" is poorly trained writers and no editors asking tough questions.
From CNN, Jan 5, 2017:
Methinks the party of Jefferson morphed into the party of Marx.
5.56mm
Don’t confuse Guccifer with Guccifer 2.0.
Guccifer 2.0 looks to be WARREN FLOOD.
Sit through first couple of minutes of this to get to good info.
Excellent info.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5oAP6aumHg
Hmmmmm...
got it. thanks
CrowdStrike stands fully by its analysis and findings identifying two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network in May 2016. On June 15, 2016, a blog post to a WordPress site authored by an individual using the moniker Guccifer 2.0 claimed credit for breaching the Democratic National Committee.
Um, okay. Who is the second adversary? And what is his link to the DNC?
The Russians had nothing to do with it, NOTHING! This was all made up by the Obama administration and I wouldn’t be surprised if there are some Republicans involved in this. And you know who I mean.
There is no legimate reason to disallow FBI inspection of a server breach that implicates national security,,, unless no national security or criminal crumbs are available.
Yes, very confusing. The article says Guccifer is not connected to the Russians. But the first sentence you cited says “two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network” — the author didn’t identify EITHER of the “adversaries,” did he/she?
If Guccifer is really a Romanian, I HIGHLY doubt he’s working for the Russians. Romanians don’t like the Russians very much.
I saw that too and disregarded the whole story...
Lots of amateurs out there. Not only in the MSM.
"THIS WE KNOW AS FACT: The Pittsburgh FBI field office (Cyber-security Unit) is investigating to identify those behind breaches of the DNC's computer systems. The trail leads to a family of Muslim IT staffers who worked exclusively for Democrats on Capitol Hill."
Especially the second sentence is far beyond what I thought was known, but if it is true then it would be fantastic.
I found the video a little confusing (may have to look at her written statements) but it would be very intersting if the “Russian intelligence operation” aka Guccifer 2.0 actually turned out to be one of the owners of one of the cybersecurity companies. At least something needs to be explained!
OK, we don’t have to be that conspiratorial, but it just shows the need for these investigations to be carried out by official agencies according to generally approved forensic methods.
Several private companies involved. Have all had access to the DNC server? How have they secured the initial state of the server? Lots and lots of questions, but I believe that the DNC was very happy to leave many of those issues unanswered.
Better start reading up——the IT story has been all over FR.
http://freerepublic.com/tag/itgate/index
Agree. Even FOX News anchor on one show this morning said the Russians “hacked” the election.
The left has successfully ingrained that in the narrative.
It’s ridiculous. And frustrating
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.