There’s another possibility you might consider: it’s Hillary, and it has been Hillary all along.
1. Do you think Hillary (with O’s consent and assistance) would have pre-positioned loyalists, awaiting her coronation?
2. Do you think Hillary is vengeful, spiteful, and willing to burn down the house in the wake of her loss?
3. Does O have anything to gain PERSONALLY? (no, he can’t be President again). But does Hillary have something to gain? (yes, clear the decks for 2020!).
4. Are the leaks and damaging info coming from State & CIA? YES! And there is ALWAYS a flow of people from State to CIA, and vice-versa. Not inconceivable, but likely that Hillary put the people and apparatus in place during her time as SoS.
5. Is Brennan a Hillary sycophant? YES! Remember the stonewalling & silence from the CIA re: Benghazi, when the trail was pointing very clearly at Hillary as the source of the “stand down” order.
6. Are Hillary’s closest aides and advisors slimy, underhanded creeps - now an in the past? Yes! Begala, Carville, Podesta, etc., etc., etc.
So maybe Trump’s tweets this morning are to smoke O out of the bunker to defend HIS legacy? I wouldn’t be surprised, and we’ll know if we start seeing a trail of crumbs leading to Chappaqua.
There is merit to your thought. However.....
I would argue that Hillary is a separate and distinct matter.
What has become apparent that the Obama effort seems to indicate a divide with Hillary. That is a separate battle to be fought for control after Trump is defeated.
Both Obama and Hillary have so many skeletons they are perfect puppets. Both are weak and ineffective. Both would chop up their own daughters to BE THE KING though. Best marionettes money can buy. They will never be the top of the enemy’s leadership.