“Nothing found” means, imaginably, no illegal activity was identified during the wiretap. (Note: if so, not clearly stated).
What does it mean, “turned down court order” and then “a lawyer could make a great case out of (the alleged wiretapping of presidential candidate trump by then sitting president obama)”?
It sounds as if there was a criminal court case and could be a prospective civil court case. (Is this so?)
Trump appears to be daring the media to cover this (yes?). If so, putting it on twitter seems to make it difficult for the MSM to avoid. The MSM has been down this path many times in the past. IIRC they will cover such tweets with the usual liberal spin and then trump would let the other shoe drop. If that is the case this time, I wonder what the other shoe is?
I think you’re right that Trump is daring the media to cover it. That’s how the “early morning tweets” worked before.
Am I right that Trump has mentioned illegal Leaks, but not the illegal intercepts much at all. The intercepts are Watergate-level and worse, and easy to prove. Looks like the time has come?