I saw the posts - what I didn't see was the names of those making the claims or anything in the big-picture context of the meeting. Are we to believe unnamed sources when it gives us a twinge while slamming the LSM for using unnamed "sources"?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3528942/posts
Follow this back to its American Thinker parent article. Trump's choices are not well thought out, by and large. That's my opinion, and I don't need "sources" for it other than what I've seen in the news and here.