Skip to comments.
Trump Picks CFR Member for New National Security Advisor
The New American ^
| Tuesday, 21 February 2017
| Warren Mass
Posted on 02/25/2017 7:53:31 AM PST by imardmd1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Garth Tater
.
Plug the hole in your head.
Being forced to join a club involuntarily reflects nothing about anyone’s ideology.
You are intellectually slothful and vapid. You had nothing of use to add to this discussion but white noise.
.
61
posted on
02/26/2017 10:26:21 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: imardmd1; trebb
.
>> “Trump’s choices are not well thought out...” <<
Trump’s first choice at NSA was perfectly thought out, as can be seen by the volume of attack against him by the usual Babylonian suspects.
Your accusations are what are not well thought out.
.
62
posted on
02/26/2017 10:31:11 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: JimRed
.
>> “So, every member must be a de facto globalist?” <<
Pickled craniums are difficult to think with.
.
63
posted on
02/26/2017 10:33:12 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: editor-surveyor; admin
e-s:
Your posts are disinformation . . . You don't like my opinions. That's OK, it's a free country (Free Republic).
e-s: . . . and false accusation . . ."
But now you're flat-out calling me a liar.
e-s: . . . against people about whom you know absolutely nothing.
And now you think you can read my mind, a deliberate offense against this forum. Then further:
e-s: You have born false witness against many without name.
You're doubling down on personalizing your attack, to which I object. Do not post any more replies that are personal attacks. This is not the first time you have taken this approach with me, and it's very irritating.
64
posted on
02/26/2017 12:50:10 PM PST
by
imardmd1
(Fiat Lux)
To: editor-surveyor
Being forced to join a club involuntarily reflects nothing about anyones ideology.
Wrong. No one is forced to join the CFR, they simply choose to do so as a resume enhancement. When they place their own well-being above the cause of freedom and to the detriment of their nation they out themselves as having no ideology other than what's-best-for-me and are nothing more than self-serving weasels - much as yourself.
65
posted on
02/26/2017 1:14:30 PM PST
by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
To: Garth Tater
.
You’re full of crap.
The vast majority of CFR members are there by force through employment with a multi-national corporation.
.
66
posted on
02/26/2017 3:51:03 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: imardmd1
.
>> “But now you’re flat-out calling me a liar.” <<
In your twisted mind I’m sure that you have created alternate realities to justify your false attacks.
.
67
posted on
02/26/2017 3:53:55 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: editor-surveyor
The vast majority of CFR members are there by force through employment with a multi-national corporation.
At the point of a gun, eh? No other choice, right? Join or die? Keep on rationalizing your weak willed choices toady.
68
posted on
02/26/2017 4:15:44 PM PST
by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
To: editor-surveyor
Yeah. I’ve checked your profile and see why you might imagine that.
69
posted on
02/26/2017 4:38:18 PM PST
by
imardmd1
(Fiat Lux)
To: Garth Tater
.
The point of a prestigious job moron.
Go back to your news stand, a bus is coming.
.
70
posted on
02/26/2017 4:38:50 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: imardmd1
.
Actually we all know from your wacked out posts. No imagination is required.
.
71
posted on
02/26/2017 4:40:52 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: editor-surveyor
72
posted on
02/26/2017 4:43:19 PM PST
by
imardmd1
(Fiat Lux)
To: editor-surveyor
If you value a prestigious job above patriotism I have no respect for you or anything you have to say. I hope your butt kissing serves you well on your rise through the ranks of corporate toadies.
73
posted on
02/26/2017 5:02:43 PM PST
by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
To: editor-surveyor
Agree - almost thought you had misinterpreted one of my comments but saw that you had responded to one I was disagreeing with. Lots of concern trolls who don’t seem to be able to go 5 minutes w/o trying to find some reason to feel disappointed in or betrayed by President Trump - they’d be clamoring for Reagan to be impeached by now....
74
posted on
02/27/2017 3:01:12 AM PST
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Garth Tater
You’re a complete dipshit.
Complying with a company’s policy is no assault on anyone’s patriotism.
You’re just going out of your way to criticize good appointments.
.
75
posted on
02/27/2017 2:47:26 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: editor-surveyor
Complying with a companys policy is no assault on anyones patriotism.
Joining an organization whose stated goal is bringing about the supremacy of a one world government is most definitely unpatriotic. Rationalize all you need in order to feel good about the weak willed choices you've made as you've brown nosed your way up the corporate ladder but you're still an unpatriotic weasel.
Youre a complete dipshit.
Considering the source, I take that as a compliment.
76
posted on
02/27/2017 3:05:05 PM PST
by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
To: imardmd1
The Neo-cons won when the CIA took out Flynn. That’s just how it is. On the upside no way that there’s no chance of a war with Russia under Trump which is still light years better than Hillary or the rest.
77
posted on
02/27/2017 3:08:09 PM PST
by
RedWulf
(a)
To: Garth Tater
.
To a rational person, the goals of the org are irrelevent if you are not participating in the advancement of those goals.
To a deep dipshit like you, anything you can do to defile a person is A-OK if it helps your irrational agitprop float along the sewer.
Thanks for sharing your life profile with us.
.
78
posted on
02/27/2017 4:54:26 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: editor-surveyor
To a rational person, the goals of the org are irrelevent if you are not participating in the advancement of those goals.
You can continue rationalizing the weak willed choices you've made to further your career all you want - but no one is buying your rationalizations other than yourself.
ps. Try using a spell checker. I know spelling, like making moral choices, must be difficult for you.
79
posted on
02/27/2017 5:18:51 PM PST
by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
To: Garth Tater
.
I haven’t had to make any “weak willed” choices at any time; I’m a self employed professional engineer.
You are off in dreamland looking for a flimsy reason to condemn some of the finest public servants we have.
F___ you and your kind!
You are a complete drag on society.
.
80
posted on
02/27/2017 5:34:36 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson