Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

“The legislation would take down the foundation of Obamacare, including the unpopular individual mandate,...”

Uhn huh and then you humbly inform us there is in fact an individual mandate:

“Instead, there would be a penalty of 30% for those who fail to maintain coverage. “


6 posted on 02/24/2017 1:14:59 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vendome

Exactly—the 30% is a mandate, only collected by the insurance companies rather than the IRS.


16 posted on 02/24/2017 1:38:31 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Vendome

What’s the problem with those who refuse to contribute to the insurance pool being charged more when they show up demanding to use it? The alternatives are pre-existing condition exclusion, the current mandate system, or forcing the rest of us to pay the costs of the irresponsible. Those claims paying pools don’t fill themselves.


20 posted on 02/24/2017 2:27:19 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (So Long Obie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson