Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oroville Dam Got No Obama Stimulus Funds For Repair In 2009.
IWB ^ | Pamela Williams

Posted on 02/24/2017 6:25:18 AM PST by davikkm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: davikkm

I was one of the first to say it... that’s why “stimulus” is not the answer, no matter which party is pimping it. Sorry NorCal... I knew it in my heart, you were punished by the last admin, while I bet SoCal got your share to terrorize the state and provide funds to unions and to hire protestitutes and R Emmanuel.


21 posted on 02/24/2017 7:18:35 AM PST by momincombatboots (Line up dems, Donald is going to save your district with a trillion nonexistent stimulus dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I have explained on other threads that i was building a very large public project in California when Obama came into office. We watched and commented upon how certain states, like California and Illinois, took projects starting, ready to start and about to start and stopped them while they added them to the list of Stimulus projects. The goal was to transfer state projects for the democrat states to Federal funding and then the State used their money for politically supporting THERE selected special people in research, education, law, and NGOs.


22 posted on 02/24/2017 7:21:27 AM PST by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

As much as I hate Obama for all the screw-ups he did, this one was not his. The damn,along with a number of them, was earmarked for money, but it was to be spent by three power companies in California that sited that the damn met federal safety standards and that “earth” spillways were acceptable. This one was the screw-up of California that told the feds they didn’t need the funds and by states rights, they had the last say.

But when it all came down to it, Gov. Moonbeam, who was a major part of the idiocy, may say that Trump isn’t his president, but it didn’t stop him from begging emergency funds from Trump who surrendered the cash immediately. Can you hear him now gov?

red


23 posted on 02/24/2017 7:28:28 AM PST by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
there wasn't enough money left for infrastructure after obozo’s friends received most of that stimulus money
24 posted on 02/24/2017 7:40:30 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: homegroan

SHAVE THE BEAVERS

:-)


25 posted on 02/24/2017 7:43:44 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

And, there was no need to se the money to repair and create dams because the man-made climate change had doomed California to perpetual drought. The politicized waacka-doodle Berkley scientific community believed their own hype. Hubris is great, ‘eh?


26 posted on 02/24/2017 8:19:40 AM PST by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

CAUTION:: ‘No Fault’ Gubamint At Work


27 posted on 02/24/2017 9:16:34 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

Only 9% of the so called stimulus actually went to true public works infrastructure projects. Most of those were simple asphalt overlay projects as those were considered exempt from environmental regulations which is the biggest killer of project delivery due to the time needed to comply and get final project approval.


28 posted on 02/24/2017 9:24:23 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Don’t think you can lay this on Obama. Did the State of California make a specific request for 2009 stimulus fund to pave the emergency spillway at Oroville dam. Why should they give Federal money for a project that the State of California did not request. It was not a Federal Dam. Why should the Federal Government care. It was not a requirement for renewing the license for the dam. The California engineers said it was not needed. Evidently the Federal Engineers didn’t think it was necessary either. The only group that thought it should be required was three environmental organizations. All they did was petition the Federal Government to make it a requirement for the dam’s license renewal.


29 posted on 02/24/2017 9:38:46 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71

Yeah, Governor Brown sounds quite silly now asking for help from the one he despises so much.


30 posted on 02/24/2017 9:46:03 AM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe

You said:
The California engineers said it was not needed. Evidently the Federal Engineers didn’t think it was necessary either.

Thats cuz the ‘Best Minds in America’ at Berserkly University and USC told everyone the dam was safe


31 posted on 02/24/2017 9:50:53 AM PST by litehaus (A memory toooo long.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

So you would spend 10-15 million on a project yours and the federal engineers said wasn’t necessary.


32 posted on 02/24/2017 10:38:44 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Related thread:

What happened the $7.5 Billion Water Bond Money that California voters approved in 2014?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3528900/posts


33 posted on 02/27/2017 6:31:37 AM PST by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and Protect our Troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

Unions? Banks?


34 posted on 02/27/2017 8:21:51 AM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

That is true. The women lobbied for, and received, a good portion of the money for increased services, employing more women, instead of infrastructure spending.


35 posted on 02/27/2017 8:44:09 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I witnessed that myself.


36 posted on 02/27/2017 8:59:25 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
Almost one trillion dollars EVERY year! Congress never passed a budget during Obama's tenure. They used so-called baseline budgeting. This means every line item just had the same agreed upon percentage increase from the previous year's budget. Good programs, boondoggles, all the same.

What did congress do for the past 6 years? The House of Representatives primary responsility is the budget.

The go along to get along days are over. There is a new sheriff in town.

37 posted on 02/27/2017 2:33:19 PM PST by Freee-dame (Best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson