Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil

Wasn’t there a ruling once that said shotguns were not used in wars, so they weren’t protected?

A decenting view...


15 posted on 02/23/2017 4:42:00 AM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: teeman8r

Shotguns were used in WW1- trench guns if I am not mistaken


33 posted on 02/23/2017 5:23:52 AM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: teeman8r
Wasn’t there a ruling once that said shotguns were not used in wars, so they weren’t protected?

It was United States v. Miller, and the actual issue was that short-barreled shotguns were not used as weapons of war.

They were, in fact, used by the tens of thousands in WWI by the United States Army. However, since neither Miller nor his attorney showed up to present this evidence as an argument to the court in his defense, it was ruled that since short-barreled shotguns were not used by the military, they were not protected under the Second Amendment.

51 posted on 02/23/2017 6:09:25 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool - you bet that Tommy sees! - Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson