Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Blocks Texas from Slashing Medicaid Dollars Earmarked for Planned Parenthood
NBC DFW ^ | 2/21 | Paul J. Weber

Posted on 02/21/2017 5:38:46 PM PST by nickcarraway

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Texas can't cut off Medicaid dollars to Planned Parenthood over secretly recorded videos taken by anti-abortion activists in 2015 that launched Republican efforts across the U.S. to defund the nation's largest abortion provider.

An injunction issued by U.S. District Sam Sparks of Austin comes after he delayed making decision in January and essentially bought Planned Parenthood an extra month in the state's Medicaid program.

Texas is now at least the sixth state where federal courts have kept Planned Parenthood eligible for Medicaid reimbursements for non-abortion services, although a bigger question remains over whether President Donald Trump will federally defund the organization.

Sparks' decision preserves what Planned Parenthood says are cancer screenings, birth control access and other health services for nearly 11,000 low-income women. Texas originally intended to boot Planned Parenthood in January but Sparks told the state to wait pending his ruling.

Arkansas, Alabama, Kansas, Mississippi and Louisiana have also had similar efforts blocked.

Like in those states, Texas health officials accused Planned Parenthood officials of making misrepresentation to investigators following the release of secretly recorded and heavily edited videos by an anti-abortion group last year. Investigations by 13 states into those videos have concluded without criminal charges, and Planned Parenthood officials have denied any wrongdoing.

A Houston grand jury indicted two activists behind the videos over how they covertly gained access inside a Planned Parenthood clinic, but a judge later dismissed the charges. Planned Parenthood serves only a fraction of the 4.3 million people enrolled in Medicaid in Texas.

Anti-abortion activists emboldened by a new Trump administration are looking for the federal government to cut off all federal funding to Planned Parenthood. That would cut nearly $400 million in Medicaid money to the group and result in roughly 400,000 women losing access to care, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

In one of his first acts as president, Trump last month banned U.S. funding to international groups that perform abortions or even provide information about abortions. Vice President Mike Pence strongly opposes abortion, citing his Catholic beliefs, and the newly confirmed health secretary, Tom Price, has supported cutting off taxpayer money to Planned Parenthood.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: abortion; defundpp; plannedparenthood; prolife; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 02/21/2017 5:38:46 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Is it easier to list what the judiciary CAN'T do ?

or is it just me

2 posted on 02/21/2017 5:40:42 PM PST by onona (Keeping the faith will be our new directive for the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All



Click The Pic To Donate

3 posted on 02/21/2017 5:43:18 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

America’s robed mullahs and the looting of the republic. Keeping an eye on them ALERT!


4 posted on 02/21/2017 5:43:48 PM PST by PGalt (HOORAY President Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The legislature can spend State money how it sees fit. I think the fact that it’s federal money (Medicaid) makes it so only US congress can change it.

Fine. Change it in D.C.


5 posted on 02/21/2017 5:46:02 PM PST by Principled (OMG I'm so tired of all this winning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onona

Just another judge needs nuetering.


6 posted on 02/21/2017 5:47:35 PM PST by Dogbert41 (Jerusalem is the city of The Great King! Forgive my misspelling when on my tablet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Such a revolutionalry statement the Trump spokesman made last week that the branches were co-equal.

Rule by globalist judiciary is also how the EU is set up.


7 posted on 02/21/2017 5:47:59 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Is PP a federal department?


8 posted on 02/21/2017 5:51:16 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled
In my state Medicaid is administered by the state and funding is a combination of federal and state funds. It is a means-tested program so patients basically must be indigent to receive the funding. I would be curious to see how many of those accessing PP services (e.g., abortion) meet the means-testing guidelines. I'm wondering if this judge is using the federal funding component as a pretext to engage in judicial activism.
9 posted on 02/21/2017 5:52:53 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Austin! The San Francisco of Texas!!


10 posted on 02/21/2017 5:53:53 PM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt; ExTexasRedhead

“America’s robed mullahs and the looting of the republic. Keeping an eye on them ALERT!”

This is THE MOST SERIOUS PROBLEM WE FACE AS A NATION! President Trump needs to have a group devoted to vetting bona fide conservative judges for the Federal Courts, and he needs to aggressively appoint and seat them. Also, he needs to look into what needs to be done vis a vis the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Cut it up, pack it, whatever, but FIX IT! Put ten more 30 year old conservative judges on it if that’s what it takes. And go get that bastard Federal Judge in Washington State! Judges are NOT Legislators!


11 posted on 02/21/2017 5:55:21 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Principled

According to the Kaiser Foundation, the State of Texas contributes 41.1% of its Medicaid costs. I wonder if there is a way to cut the funding for abortions by 41.1% until D.C. can (if ever) fix this problem.


12 posted on 02/21/2017 5:56:39 PM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41
Just another judge needs nuetering.

Nope, it's the judiciary ITSELF that needs neutering. They've gotten WAY to comfortable with providing "cover" for the political branches getting things "We the People" refuse to give them.

13 posted on 02/21/2017 5:57:13 PM PST by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

We need to start slapping these activist “judges” with a little judicial malpractice. They’ve play god long enough. This crap has to stop.


14 posted on 02/21/2017 5:57:47 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What part of the federal
shall not establish institutions against state wishes do these judges not understand?

I would defy that order and so sue me. It is unconstitutional


15 posted on 02/21/2017 6:01:49 PM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

When medicaid was brought into being was there ever an aim to pay for abortions with it?


16 posted on 02/21/2017 6:03:13 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life ~ Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

I believe juries/legislatures and not judges should make these types of decisions. A judge could, say, tell a governor to put his decision to a vote, but that is it.

Why does everyone pu$$ies out to these idiota!?


17 posted on 02/21/2017 6:04:10 PM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

Past time for defying the courts.


18 posted on 02/21/2017 6:04:39 PM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

PP is a private company. Under what authority does a judge have the authority to order a state to expend public money on a private company?


19 posted on 02/21/2017 6:08:38 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

What part of murder don’t they understand. Those in leadership positions will be judged more stringently by God. I would think that would be enough for those judges to quake in their boots. Vengeance is mine saith the Lord. Deuteronomy 32:35 “It is mine to avenge; I will repay. In due time their foot will slip; their day of disaster is near and their doom rushes upon them.”


20 posted on 02/21/2017 6:14:52 PM PST by Maudeen (No one on this earth is too far gone for Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson