It’s Not About Milo – It’s About The Existential Threat That Milo Represents…

The Conservative Treehouse ^ | Feb. 20, 2017 | Sundance

[HarleyLady27]

There are trillions of dollars at stake. Trillions.

Those who hold power will never relinquish power; a simple and timeless truth. The current attacks against an increasingly less obscure gay man named Milo Yiannopoulos (it appears he is most known simply by “Milo”) are not about Milo Yiannopoulos per se’, anyone who has followed the construct of the swamp should see the transparency.

[Teacher317]

That’s more than clear enough to get him invited back. We should be emulating Trump’s stands against the media smear machine, and the PC-only nonsense that Milo has been attacking. Abandoning him now would be dumb.

[SarahPalin2012]

I support Milo 100%. He has been a General in this war. Thank God for Milo. I do not support his homosexuality, but he is not a homosexual activist — that’s very different — and I do hope that this sinful issue gets addressed at some point (between him and God). Just like my many sinful issues I hope gets addressed — but don’t let the left get you sidetracked.

[granada]

Dunno. As far as i can see, it’s about Bannon.

[SarahPalin2012]

goldstategop, you said,

I don’t abandon core values to be hip and cool.

Don't worry dude -- no matter what you abandon you wouldn't be hip and cool. And no matter how principled you think you are, having seen your posts for years, you are nothing but a first class moron who I'm ashamed of having on our side, and currently the side of Trump.

[Mears]

Nasty post.

.

[RitaOK]

Cpac is in on the fix if your premise holds, and this is a UniParty hit against Milo, as Sundance suggests, to start the climb to Bannon and on to Trump.

I am as unfamiliar with Milo as is Sundance. I read of him occasionally as a controversial figure and a big hit with the university aged adults. I had heard that he was gay. I was surprised to hear that the pristine punditry that is CPAC ever invited Milo to their convention, in the first place.

Now the controversial Milo says something controversial and CPAC is quick to choke, for clutching their pearls too tightly. Sheesh. What is going on with the full frontal assault? We know the forces are after Bannon, therefore it is impossible not to connect the dots, exactly as Sundance suggests.

[wbarmy]

a conservative Christian that is gay

An oxymoron of the highest degree. He cannot be a conservative Christian and be gay. Being gay in his world means sex outside of marriage, sodomy, and multiple partners. If you were discussing a heterosexual person who was running around on their wife and publicly stating how wonderful his open marriage was, would you classify them as a conservative Christian?

[fuzzylogic]

That would make you a hypocrite. He was the victim of child abuse which has a significant impact on sexual development. The *consequences* of living the gay lifestyle are well documented - as are ALL sins.

You’re comment is exactly why young people turn away from the Church. You’re basically saying “you can’t be a sinner and be a conservative Christian”.

Wow. See you on judgement day.

[ELS]

We are all sinners. Some sins are more public than others.

[wbarmy]

Correct. You cannot be an unrepentant sinner and a conservative Christian. You can be a Christian, for all have sinned and come short of the glory of God, but you cannot say you are conservative and still live in and revel in your sin.

As for children turning away from the Church, many do and turn toward faith. The Church is a much greater hypocrite than I will ever be, for the Church asks for faith in it. Jesus Christ demands faith in Him.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Well CPAC is not gay friendly. No secret there. Remember several years ago when they wanted to exclude the log cabin republicans which is a gay caucus?

I believe the anti Milo stuff this year is the never Trumpers at work.

Milo does not endorse pedophilia. He had his first sexual encounter at age 13. He thinks that’s an age of consent. Its an arguable point based on your particular point of view.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Although Milo isn't pro-pedophilia (sexual exploitation of pre-puberty boys) he has outed himself as pro-pederasty (sexual exploitation of underage, post-puberty boys.)

So: arguable? Justifiable? Not for conservatives, it isn't.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Yeh, I don’t think so. I think Milo is just gay and views gay activity as his norm. He started having sex at 13. I think a lot of hetero 13 year olds are doing the same thing.

I think its hard for conservatives to deal with the gay lifestyle. Personally I don’t think its a healthy lifestyle. I just don’t judge.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I have gay friends and family members whom I hsve been knowing and loving for 50 years. I don't judge people because the Almighty has not given me infused knowledge of the inside of their souls.

But I do, and must, judge ideas and ideologies as good or evil; words as true or false; deeds as right or wrong.

The LGBT ideology (or cluster of ideologies) is evil; its public policy preferences are based on falsehood; its deeds are wrongful and harmful.

As for Milo himself, I think he knows this; he has been speaking out publicly lately about his desire to renounce the gay lifestyle; and I heartily wish him well. May God guide him--- and me, too --- into a better, more morally decent life.

[Mrs. Don-o]

It just occurred to me, that the first man who ever gave me flowers, was gay! Sweet thought.