To: Brad from Tennessee
2 posted on
02/17/2017 1:58:39 PM PST by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: Brad from Tennessee
It seems counter-intuitive to me that adding more moving parts to a rifle will make it more reliable.
3 posted on
02/17/2017 2:02:17 PM PST by
Nachoman
(My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
4 posted on
02/17/2017 2:06:06 PM PST by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Sticking with the 556 NATO. Ugh.
7 posted on
02/17/2017 2:18:04 PM PST by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Didn’t they also recently issue a RFP for the new Sig pistol with interchangeable barrels for different calibers? Thought I heard something about that but can’t remember from where.
9 posted on
02/17/2017 2:28:56 PM PST by
Hat-Trick
(Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Anything that reduces operator cleaning time is alright by me.
10 posted on
02/17/2017 2:30:34 PM PST by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Brad from Tennessee
Isn't this the same system on the LWRC?
You can pick one up (minus scope and extras), for about $2600.
32 posted on
02/17/2017 5:21:24 PM PST by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
