What’s wrong with birth control?
See #9 and #12
>>>What’s wrong with birth control?
I am not passing judgement on career women who use birth control. I am just discussing the demographic situation as it existed before 1930.
Cintracsption de-sacralizes sex by substituting a different nonfunctional design, in place of God’s design. In effect, most contraception is based on the assumption that normal female fertility is a glitch, not a feature.
As if women were designed wrong-—by whatever idiot designed them, -— but we can fix that!
So it is from a JudeoChristian point of view, sacrilege; and from a Natural Law point of view, misogynistic and maiming: an intentional impairment or disabling of normal female physiological function.
ON THE OTHER HAND, methods of spacing or postponing pregnancy which do not sabotage natural fertility -— e.g. choosing go have intercourse at naturally infertile times of the cycle -— are more pro-whole-woman and not objectionable.
People who are for birth control, shouldn’t complain about illegal immigration. Decreased fertility costs a huge influx in immigration.
Contracepted sexual practice has a lot in common with LGBT sexual practice. It’s choosing to reject natural sex -— whole, normal, and healthy, complete in all the deep and intricate and life-altering ramifications of male-female intimacy -— and to re-cast it into a different, non-natural version which you hope will somehow be more enriching, more carefree and more fun.
Q:What’s wrong with birth control?
A: One of the biggest unintended consequences is the pervasive female “slut culture” and radical feminism.
Not by any means saying all women are like this now, but it’s grown exponentially in the West since BC arrived on the scene.