Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain; fuzzylogic

>
They could say that, but it would be false. They did not have to enter your store. They are the ones violating your rights, not the other way around. You have no right to require people to do things they do not wish to do.
>

Though technically correct, your premise has ~100yrs+. precedent of being ‘false’ (any\all ‘welfare’ [taken by the point of a gun], O’Care, Kilo, etc.).


59 posted on 02/16/2017 12:03:20 PM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73

As we are talking about individuals demanding that other individuals cater to them, I would say the precedent is only about 50 years, form the civil rights act of 1964.


60 posted on 02/16/2017 12:08:22 PM PST by marktwain (We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson