Skip to comments.
‘Never Chelsea’ movement grows among liberal activists(Ruh Roh)
washingtontimes.com ^
| 2/13/2017
| Seth McLaughlin
Posted on 02/14/2017 7:18:58 AM PST by rktman
BALTIMORE They werent ready for Hillary, and now theyre definitely not ready for her daughter, Chelsea Clinton.
The activists who fueled Sen. Bernard Sanders presidential bid last year and who have become the raging heart of the party as it seeks to rebuild itself, shudder at the thought of the 36-year-old daughter of the former president and secretary of state searching for a race of her own.
Chelsea needs to go away, said Guinevere Boyd, a 49-year-old from Alaska who attended a Democratic National Committee forum this weekend. She has nothing to offer. She has said some horrible clueless things about progressives and progressive issues.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: chelsea; clintoons; neverchelsea; selections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
I put the "Ruh Roh" in the header as kind of a warning. I seem to remember another certain party that had a campaign of "Never XXX". Now, after all their whining and complaining and attempts to prevent him from winning, "Never XXX" is the president. Thank God. So, we have Trump until '24 and then Pence until '32. Guess we need to come up with a candidate to field 16 years from now.
1
posted on
02/14/2017 7:18:58 AM PST
by
rktman
To: rktman
The names “Clinton” and “Bush” have become officially toxic to the national body politic.
To: rktman
Never Trump came and went in less than a year.
Never Bush has been around ever since the beginning of the Obama administration and is a much closer parallel to Never Chelsea.
To: rktman
The one to watch out for is Michelle Obama, mark my words.
4
posted on
02/14/2017 7:26:13 AM PST
by
ratzoe
(damn, I miss Barbara Olson)
To: rktman
5
posted on
02/14/2017 7:29:11 AM PST
by
bigbob
(We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
To: ratzoe
Our worst nightmare . . . Obama/Warren . . .
6
posted on
02/14/2017 7:29:16 AM PST
by
rhubarbk
(1/20/2017, What a beautiful Day!!!)
To: rktman
Momma, why are them mean people saying they don't want me to run? You promised me a Senate seat. You promised!!!!
7
posted on
02/14/2017 7:29:38 AM PST
by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: ratzoe
I am much more concerned about Lieawatha.
8
posted on
02/14/2017 7:29:47 AM PST
by
Zarro
(Oh, we don't call them the "MSM" any longer; they are now the "Basket of Detestables")
To: ratzoe
It won’t hurt to keep a wary eye out for her but I don;t believe she would ever go far.
Did you read her college thesis? She’s REALLY stupid.
9
posted on
02/14/2017 7:30:24 AM PST
by
Mr. K
To: ratzoe
Indeed, you are correct. Dumb as a rock but nobody cares.
10
posted on
02/14/2017 7:31:58 AM PST
by
JerseyDvl
(PRESIDENT TRUMP trumps hate and racism! Put some ice on it Hitlery ;-)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
I didn’t know Chelsae knew Chairman Mao.
11
posted on
02/14/2017 7:34:51 AM PST
by
Ouchthatonehurt
("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
To: rktman
From the article, the never Chelsea democrats are mainly the ones who don’t think she is radical enough. (Her cut some slack on attacking Trump’s son Barron was deemed offensive to them.) So, if she moves totally crazy left, they would probably be happy and support another Clinton in politics.
12
posted on
02/14/2017 7:35:30 AM PST
by
Nevadan
To: rhubarbk
Even worse, tony weiner and chelsea handler-——weiner/handler.
13
posted on
02/14/2017 7:38:44 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: Mr. K
Dumb, lazy, and uncharismatic.
The only advantage she would have compared to Clinton is that she is too lazy to do much of anything that would get her involved in scandals.
To: rktman
I guess that leaves Caroline Kennedy as the “fresh face”....
15
posted on
02/14/2017 7:43:47 AM PST
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: rktman
No worries lefties; when the time comes, you will be told to embrace Chelsie, and I assure you will.
Leftist are all sheep
16
posted on
02/14/2017 7:44:00 AM PST
by
DanielRedfoot
(Viva Le Deplorable)
To: rktman
Chelsea Clinton’s not smart enough OR corrupt enough... and she’s too ‘honest’ to lie well. Democrats won’t go near her.
17
posted on
02/14/2017 7:46:26 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Democrats appoint activist 'judges' to legislate from the bench. WE NEED TO DO THE SAME.)
To: ratzoe
18
posted on
02/14/2017 7:48:36 AM PST
by
Don W
( When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
“The names Clinton and Bush have become officially toxic to the national body politic.”
That’s a good thing.
We don’t want dynasties in this nation
19
posted on
02/14/2017 7:49:57 AM PST
by
HereInTheHeartland
(I don't want better government; I want much less of it.)
To: ratzoe
The one to watch out for is Michelle Obama, mark my words. I'm going to need a steel reinforced barf bag.
20
posted on
02/14/2017 7:52:00 AM PST
by
rdl6989
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson