[Repeat Offender]

It should be left up to the property owner. If a restaurant owner wants to have a smoking restaurant that should be his choice and nonsmokers are free to go elsewhere. Likewise if he wants a nonsmoking establishment, he should be free to do so as well, and smokers can go elsewhere or smoke outside.

Nanny government should not be dictating.

[Rusty0604]

Amen.

[dhs12345]

Have to say that it is nice to not have to deal with the smoking section at restaurants. Knowing what I know now, I would avoid all restaurants that allowed smoking.

Back in the day, lucky me, I was always stuck in the non-smoking section right next to the smoking section with the clouds flowing over the so called barrier.

I stayed in a smoking room once while I was overseas. Most miserable night of sleep my whole life. Plus, it permeated and saturated my clothes and belongings. And I don't and didn't smoke! It was in a humid area and added to a damp, moldy, acrid smell. Yuck!

Around 3am, I couldn't take it anymore and demanded that I be moved. It was a mix-up at the hotel.

[SharpRightTurn]

“It should be left up to the property owner. If a restaurant owner wants to have a smoking restaurant that should be his choice and nonsmokers are free to go elsewhere. Likewise if he wants a nonsmoking establishment, he should be free to do so as well, and smokers can go elsewhere or smoke outside. Nanny government should not be dictating.”

Bravo. I agree 1,000%.