[TheConservator]

Not without provoking a constitutional crisis.

[Rebelbase]

We’re already in a Constitutional crisis created by the black robe mafia.

[knarf]

If the court is not Constitutional in banning the order, the court’s ban is invalidated by Trump’s VERY Constitutional stand.

[VermithraxPejorative]

The judges did that.

[editor-surveyor]

.
The courts provoked the constitutional crisis.

Trump can quell it by ignoring them.
.

[editor-surveyor]

.
BTW, you’re a squish.
.

[billyboy15]

Not without provoking a constitutional crisis.
***********************************************************

You appear to be saying that Judges represent the absolute final word in this country and no matter what the Constitution says, no matter past precedent the Court can as it sees fit on any given day impose it’s will on the Nation.

Is that what you believe?

[HKMk23]

I’ve read the text of the Law, and it seems crystal clear that Congress, in passing this Law, gave The Executive broad discretion and there is NO TRACE in that Law of ANY intent on the part of Congress that the decisions made by The President under the Law should be subject to judicial review.

That whack-job Federal judge in Washington is — and ought to be fully ignored as — legally impotent to rule in this matter. AND, because that is so, the 9th Circuit has no case to rule upon, and Trump is as free as a bird to do as he pleases.

AND it would be BLOODY GOOD if SOMEONE in this Administration would strap on their gonads in time for one of the Sunday shows and THOROUGHLY explain this to the American people.

BUT, whether that happens or not, Trump ought to carry on just as he pleases come Monday morning.