To: SubMareener
Exactly why I put (?) behind ‘fossil’. Ya know, just how many friggin’ dinosaurs and how much flora and fauna do these people think there was/were anyway? I’ve seen several articles about “abiotic” petroleum in the past few years. I’m kinda leaning that direction. Which reminds me, I gotta go fill up Mrs. rktmans car this morning. And no, I am NOT saying she is a dinosaur. ;-)
11 posted on
02/09/2017 7:59:17 AM PST by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rktman
how much flora and fauna do these people think there was/were anyway?About 250+ million years worth?
15 posted on
02/09/2017 8:01:59 AM PST by
ETL
(Trump admin apparently playing "good cop, bad cop" with thug Putin (see my FR Home page))
To: rktman
The abiotic oil hypothesis is an attempt to explain the source and formation of petroleum. As the name suggests, the hypothesis proposes that oil originates from non-biological origins. The hypothesis is mostly Soviet, mostly archaic, and mostly debunked. In the Anglophone world, abiotic oil proponents tend to cite the work of the late astrophysicist (read: not geologist) Thomas Gold
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Abiotic_oil61 posted on
02/09/2017 9:35:27 AM PST by
SVTCobra03
(You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson