Posted on 02/05/2017 9:46:15 AM PST by tomselliott
LOL!!!!! Nasty Peloser strikes again!
She’s lost what little mind she ever had.
The only people stupider than Nan, is the people who keep electing her.
She is one of the few libs who I don’t damn as doing what they do because they’re trying to destroy America. True, Nan wants to destroy America......but everything she says and does is not necessarily for that reason. Mostly she is as dumb as a post.
Trump was bringing back jobs before he even started.
Is Nancy demented?
Nancy,
It is not the governments responsibility to create jobs.
It is the governments responsibility to stop destroying the creation of jobs.
How people see your mind and agree with you is not a safe place to be.
This puke is at least consistent, she’s an absolute retard
Method. Blame the wrong thing and lie.
She’s too stupid to be an idiot.
Yeah, right, like we have to worry about Somali immigrants taking jobs that require a master’s degree.
Fixed it
The word ‘senile’ comes to mind !
What a putrid rich criminal LIB lunatic.
“What Cabal comes up with her typically ridiculous talking points?”
Podesta, Brock, and the Soros clan
Go Nancy!
Is there anything we can do to get her more airtime?
Trump has only been in office for TWO WEEKS! He has saved many jobs—just imagine how he will do when his people are confirmed! What happened to the 100 days? Was it reduced to 14? or even 30?
« Nancy Pelosi So Crammed Full Of Hypocrisy Even Liberal Comic Jon Stewart Cant Take It Anymore
Obama Corrupt With YOUR Money: 80% Of DOE Boondoggle Loans Went To Obama Donors »
How Nancy Pelosi Got Rich (Corruption, Abuse Of Power Alert)
Lets just call the top Democrat in the House of Representatives what she always has been: a dishonest thief.
While Investing Millions in Exclusive Visa Stock Offering
by Wynton Hall
Former Speaker of the Houseand current Minority LeaderNancy Pelosi apparently bought $1 million to $5 million of Visa stock in one of the most sought-after and profitable initial public offerings (IPO) in American history, thwarted serious credit card reform for two years, and then watched her investment skyrocket 203%.
The revelation appears in Throw Them All Out, the new book by investigative journalist and Breitbart editor Peter Schweizer, which was the focus of 60 Minutes on CBS this evening, and which is featured in this weeks issue of Newsweek.
[See Big Government article for video]
Schweizers investigation of Pelosi and other members of Congressfrom both partiesraises a critical question: should it be legal for lawmakers to buy stocks in companies directly affected by their legislative efforts?
In early 2008, Nancy Pelosi and her real estate developer husband, Paul, were given an opportunity to buy into a Visa IPO. It was a nearly impossible featone that average citizens almost certainly could never achieve. The vast majority of purchase opportunities went to institutional investors, large mutual funds, or pension funds.
Despite Pelosis consistent railing against credit card companies, on March 18, 2008, the Pelosis bought between $1 million and $5 million (politicians do not have to report the exact amounts, only ranges) worth of Visa stock at the IPO price of $44 per share. Two days later, the stock price rocketed to $65 per share, yielding a 50% profit. The Pelosis then bought Visa twice more. By their third purchase on June 4, 2008, Visa was worth $85 per share.
How did Nancy Pelosi snag one of the most coveted initial public offerings in history? The facts are still emerging. Yet according to Schweizer, corporations that wish to build congressional allies will sometimes hand-pick members of Congress to receive IPOs. Pelosi received her Visa IPO almost two weeks after a potentially damaging piece of legislation for Visa, the Credit Card Fair Fee Act, had been introduced in the House. If passed, the bill would have cut into Visas profits substantially by lowering so-called interchange fees, the 1% to 3% charge retailers pay Visa when customers use Visa cards for purchases. Interchange fees are a critical source of revenue for the four credit card companies$48 billion in 2008, to be exact.
If the Credit Card Fair Fee Act had been passed into effect, it would have amended antitrust laws to require credit card companies to enter negotiations with merchants over interchange fees, and it would have given the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission the power to arbitrate if the two sides failed to come to an agreement. For that reason, Visa and the other credit card companies strongly opposed the bill.
The Credit Card Fair Fee Act was exactly the kind of bill one would think then-Speaker Pelosi would have backed. She had been outspoken about antitrust problems posed by insurance, oil, and pharmaceutical companies, Schweizer notes, and she was vocal about the need for controlling interest rates individual banks charged to use their credit cards.
Initially, the Credit Card Fair Fee Act cleared the Judiciary Committee on a 19-16 vote, and the National Association of Convenience Stores began lobbying for a vote on the floor of the House. It is imperative to tell your Representatives to request a vote on the House Floor from Nancy Pelosi, the association urged its members. Still, with at least ten percent of the Pelosi familys entire stock portfolio invested in a single stock, Nancy Pelosi clearly had a vested interest in ensuring that Visas profits were protected. And that is exactly what she accomplished. Despite broad public support for the bill77% in one studyPelosi saw to it that the bill never made it to the House floor.
Shortly thereafter, a second bill limiting collusion by the credit card companies on interchange fees was proposed. The Credit Card Interchange Fee Act of 2008, while not as strong as the first bill, would have required greater transparency from credit card companies in informing customers how much they were paying in interchange fees. Yet again, reports Schweizer, this second bill suffered the same fate as the first, never making it to the House floor.
By 2009, both bills had garnered even broader bipartisan support and were reintroduced. Under Speaker Pelosi, however, neither bill lived to see a vote on the House floor.
Pelosi eventually supported something called the Credit Card Reform Act. Curiously, the all-important interchange fees went untouched by that legislation. Instead, the bill stated that the interchange fee issue should simply be studied. The bills other measures would not affect Visa but rather its client banks. In short, the Credit Card Reform Act ensured that Visa and the other credit card companies dodged a potentially costly bullet.
None of that, however, prevented Pelosi from grandstanding. She publicly declared that the Credit Card Reform Act sent a strong and clear message to credit card companies that they would be held to account for their anti-consumer practices.
In the wake of the bills passage, the Pelosis shares of Visa stock rose. Indeed, according to Throw Them All Out, the IPO shares they had purchased soared by 203% from where they began, while the stock market as a whole was down 15% during the same period.
Nancy Pelosi is hardly the only member of Congress to be given IPOs, but Pelosi has been especially lucky at landing them. She and her husband have participated in at least 10 lucrative IPOs throughout her career. In 1993, Pelosi purchased IPO shares in a high-tech company named Gupta, watched the stock price leap 88% in 24 hours, then seized the profits by selling the stock the next day. The Pelosis did the same thing with Netscape and UUNet, resulting in a one-day doubling of their initial investment. Other fast and lucrative IPO flips included Remedy Corporation, Opal, Legato Systems, and Act Networks.
Schweizer says Nancy Pelosis financial disclosure forms typically mask the precise dates of her stock buys. He cites the Pelosis December 1999 stock purchase of between $250,000 and $500,000 in shares from high-tech company OnDisplay. A few months later, OnDisplay was bought by Vignette, which resulted in up to $1 million in capital gains for the Pelosis. What was unusual about the transaction is that Vignettes IPO was underwritten by a major campaign contributor and longtime friend of Nancy Pelosi, William Hambrecht.
Throw Them All Out also chronicles the Pelosis $100,000 IPO purchase of Clean Energy Fuels at roughly $12 a share. Schweizer alleges that as Speaker of the House, Pelosi pushed several bills beneficial to the company.
Similarly, in November 2007, Pelosi bought $500,000 in the IPO for Quest Energy Partners before proceeding to champion the natural gas-related legislation that stood to significantly benefit the company. When Tom Brokaw asked her whether her significant personal investments in natural gas represented a conflict of interest, Pelosi shrugged off the question by hiding behind the crony capitalists false credo: Thats the marketplace.
When youve got Democrats in power, youve got corrupt Chicago thug politics pretty much everywhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.