Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Litany

If you worked in the industry you would know Obungo’s Fiduciary Rule was bad from the start, limited choices for investors, drove up costs, would trigger more lawsuits, smaller clients would not be served properly, and now everyone would have a Stalinesque commissar’s one size fit’s all type mentality. In the pencil pusher’s world this works perfectly, in the trenches it does not. I’m a CFP and have worked in this industry for over 25 years helping thousands of people over that time. Those who don’t work in this industry truly don’t know what they’re talking about. Getting rid of the mandatory fiduciary rule is removing excess regulations and is DEFINITELY a positive thing for consumers as well as the financial services industry.


22 posted on 02/03/2017 10:09:11 AM PST by Lions Gate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Lions Gate
"would trigger more lawsuits"

Like the one against Vanguard for high cost? Yes, people don't get the industry, it is a completely different perspective on the other side of the desk. On Obama's rules, I hear compliance cost are off the Richter Scale. Love you feedback on the that last point.

25 posted on 02/03/2017 10:26:38 AM PST by taildragger (Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Lions Gate; taildragger; Maine Mariner

Thank you all for taking the time to reply and explain. I think I get it, but will have to mull it over a while.
Have a Blessed day, Litany.


40 posted on 02/03/2017 6:38:30 PM PST by Litany (Christ conquers, Christ reigns, Christ orders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson