one of the stupidest articles i have ever read...
Same here.
I found the following link helpful: The Climate Science Challenge
From the link:
Remind your scientist that as far as you know there has never been a multi-year, multi-variable, complicated model of any type that predicted anything with useful accuracy. Case in point: The experts and their models said Trump had no realistic chance of winning.Your scientist will fight like a cornered animal to conflate the credibility of the measurements and the basic science of CO2 with the credibility of the projection models. Dont let that happen. Make your scientist tell you that complicated multi-variable projections models that span years are credible. Or not.