New study: Trump to inherits $559B deficit, stable economy [says CBO]

Associated Press ^ | Jan 24, 2017 10:16 AM EST | Andrew Taylor

[marron]

Half the country out of work, but steady.

[EagleUSA]

Economy?? You mean what Obama left for America?? The total f-ing mess and HUGE DEBT he created??

That was the plan and here it is.

[Olog-hai]

And that’s 5% unemployment by their beyond-fuzzy math.

[BenLurkin]

“Stable”

Isn’t that was the news says about people who on life support are in ICUs.

[Hyman Roth]

Very very misleading headline. The deficit is for the Upcoming year. He is inheriting a TOTAL deficit of $20,000,000,000,000.

[Doogle]

to inherits .....?????

[Olog-hai]

AP didn’t get the memo that ebonics is not a viable standard.

[Regulator]

AP propaganda as normal

[abbastanza]

What world the AP watching?

[Texas Eagle]

Fake News from The Ape Pee.

Yo, Ape Pee, an economy that is on life support is not stable.

And the 559 billion dollar debt is nothing to crow about. It wasn't that long ago that Congress didn't even spend 559 billion dollars a year.

Now they spend over 2 trillion dollars a year and another 559 billion on top of that.

[Texas Eagle]

Even The Titanic is “stable”.

[central_va]

AP = All Propaganda

[Red Badger]

Trump to inherits?.................AP has fired all their editors?................

[slumber1]

President Donald Trump has inherited a stable stagnant economy and a government that is on track to run a $559 billion budget deficit for the ongoing budget year.

There, fixed it

[Olog-hai]

I had to screencap the top half of that. AP will most likely fix the typo later.

[Brilliant]

And $19.8 Trillion in debt.

[Red Badger]

They won’t notice...............

[AlphaOneAlpha]

After our “non-partisan” Congressional Budget Office gave Obamacare a big boost that it was going to be great, save money, blah blah I gave up on listening to them. The whole damned makeup of Washington is corrupt and living high on the hog.

[Olog-hai]

The press still says “non-partisan” in a transparent attempt to make it sound like the phrase is synonymous with “non-ideological”. Is anyone still fooled by that?