Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Self-Driving Cars Will Decide Who Lives & Who Dies
Industrial Equipment News ^ | 1-18-2017 | Matt O'Brien

Posted on 01/18/2017 10:09:45 AM PST by fishtank

Self-Driving Cars Will Decide Who Lives & Who Dies

But how will they make that decision?

Contributor: Matt O'Brien

BOSTON (AP) — Imagine you're behind the wheel when your brakes fail. As you speed toward a crowded crosswalk, you're confronted with an impossible choice: veer right and mow down a large group of elderly people, or veer left into a woman pushing a stroller.

Now imagine you're riding in the back of a self-driving car. How would it decide?

(Excerpt) Read more at ien.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: cars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Dr. Sivana
I don’t plan on ever having a self-driving car.

They will be optional at first but eventually we will not have a choice. I know this sound ludicrous but it will happen.

21 posted on 01/18/2017 10:20:59 AM PST by Sales Rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Guess I’ll be walking then...


22 posted on 01/18/2017 10:22:26 AM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

I have a problem with the hypothetical anyway. I mean, imagine the same scenario but a human is driving. No matter what choice he makes, is it better than the choice a self driving car (SDC) would make? And assuming the SDC can choose, would it not mean that some humans have, more carefully than a human driver making a snap decision, programmed in the best solution? Or not?

I agree with you but would add that this scenario seems to be designed to look for problems where none really exists. Like you said, this is absurdly rare and, therefore a red herring.


23 posted on 01/18/2017 10:22:30 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rey
Rock the Snack Bar. Didn’t the Clash perform that?

That's "Rock the Cash Bar".

24 posted on 01/18/2017 10:22:35 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Who has the liability ?
the smart-car,, and not me of course..
25 posted on 01/18/2017 10:22:38 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (>> M A G A << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Saw this same situation on Bull a couple weeks ago.

First time I’d seen Michael Weatherly since 86-ing NCIS a few years ago after they’d axed or killed off the Israelis, turned Mindy’s husband into god, and gelded Tony and Tim.

And Bishop. What a loser.

End of rant.


26 posted on 01/18/2017 10:22:41 AM PST by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Kinda like Obummer care


27 posted on 01/18/2017 10:23:05 AM PST by Paul46360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Now imagine you’re riding in the back of a self-driving car. How would it decide?

_______________________________________

What an idiotic “what if” scenario.

Self driving cars use so many thousands of smart algorithms per second that any such car with brakes about to fail would never even be on the road in the first place. It would self park itself before it ever got started.

As leery as I am (as anyone of us are) about riding in a self driving car; I’d sooner do that than ride with some idiot who knows their brakes could fail and as a result would have to pay the “what if” game by deciding who lives and who dies.


28 posted on 01/18/2017 10:24:10 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

29 posted on 01/18/2017 10:25:30 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

A more reasonable scenario: A two lane road with a cliff to your right. Suddenly, a group of people dash out into the highway. Too late to brake. Do you:

A) Swerve left into oncoming traffic? Maybe killing yourself, your family, and the occupants of the car you hit head-on?

B) Swerve right off the cliff, definitely killing yourself and your family riding with you.

C) Plow right into the people on the highway, thereby killing them.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I would not ride in a self-driving car programmed for A or B. I want my family protected. I choose the manufacturer who programs C.

Yet, deliberately programming a car to choose C would open up the car manufacturer to all kinds of legal risk. It is because of programming issues like this...and their legal ramifications....that we will not have self-driving cars until the law catches up with the technology.


30 posted on 01/18/2017 10:26:27 AM PST by RepRivFarm ("During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sales Rep

Guess my 1968 Ford and I will stay on the back roads then. Only way I would consider a self driving car is if I was old and frail to the point on not being capable of driving, then I will comply as I would have no other better options.


31 posted on 01/18/2017 10:27:22 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

“As you speed toward a crowded crosswalk, you’re confronted with an impossible choice: veer right and mow down a large group of elderly people, or veer left into a woman pushing a stroller.”

I’m hitting the old people. They’ve led a full life, and might die tomorrow anyway for all I know. That baby in a stroller hasn’t had a chance yet.


32 posted on 01/18/2017 10:27:24 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
There are better hypotheticals than this one.

You are driving by a park and a kid runs out in front of you chasing a ball. You cannot break in time to avoid hitting him. If you swerve right, you will hit a bunch of other kids in the park. If you swerve left, you will hit an oncoming car head on.

Which will your car choose?

33 posted on 01/18/2017 10:28:38 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (Ding Dong the Witch is Dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Is she wearib a VOTE HILLAY or is there a VOTE HILLARY STCKER on the stroller? If so the decision is done, TOWARDS them.
34 posted on 01/18/2017 10:28:44 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Do I have time for eeny-meeny-miney-moe?


35 posted on 01/18/2017 10:29:44 AM PST by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Or your vehicle’s wifi system or whatever system has a hick up, and there is no control of your self driving vehicle.

You are in your back seat with the car heading into an on coming semi truck, or into the back of a semi carrying telephone poles extending 15’ past the rear of the semi, or into a pack of Trump haters protesting several years of Trump being president.

Do I have a choice or have to ride it out.

Could I program it to hit the old Trump protesters?


36 posted on 01/18/2017 10:29:46 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The deadliest Islamic terror cell America has ever faced is leaving office, 20 Jan 2017!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

If you like your car, you can keep your car.


37 posted on 01/18/2017 10:31:47 AM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

These are the sort of false hypothetical that the left creates all the time to promote regulations.

It is easy to create silly hypotheticals to push for any regulation you want.


38 posted on 01/18/2017 10:32:32 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

This is a silly hypothetical. Chances of it happening are almost nil.

Personally, I’m not holding my breath waiting for autonomous cars to take over the roads. The best technology currently out there requires a huge array of sensors to be able to navigate safely, and still have problems if visibility is limited (especially if the sensors are obscured by snow and ice).

When you hear people saying that self-driving cars would be more feasible if the lines on the road were painted better, you know the technology is not ready for prime time. If it isn’t at least capable of handling the same variety of conditions and situations as an average human driver (and the average driver is not very good, and they still have no problem figuring out where the road goes if the lines are a bit sketchy), then it’s not ready for the road.

But yeah, when it does come, we probably won’t own the cars anymore. They’ll be too complicated and expensive, with serious maintenance requirements, and liability concerns, that only corporations or maybe public utilities will be able to operate them.

That is, unless someone manages to produce real AI sometime in the next couple of years - AI that can really understand what it is seeing, rather than just running mindless algorithms.


39 posted on 01/18/2017 10:32:48 AM PST by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like tractor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Technology is never a substitute for good management (decision making).


40 posted on 01/18/2017 10:33:12 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson