Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Germany’s Leopard tanks prove vulnerable in Islamic State fight
STARS AND STRIPES ^ | January 17, 2017 | SLOBODAN LEKIC

Posted on 01/18/2017 5:02:51 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2017 5:02:51 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That’s a big ruh roh, ISIS beating back tank attacks.


2 posted on 01/18/2017 5:11:33 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

As obsolete as cavalry against a soldier with a handheld missile.


3 posted on 01/18/2017 5:12:15 AM PST by Neidermeyer (Bill Clinton is a 5 star general in the WAR ON WOMEN and Hillary is his Goebbels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

How many TOW missiles did we sell ISIS at the bazaar in Benghazi?


4 posted on 01/18/2017 5:13:31 AM PST by Neidermeyer (Bill Clinton is a 5 star general in the WAR ON WOMEN and Hillary is his Goebbels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

“That’s a big ruh roh, ISIS beating back tank attacks.”

Well, aren’t the ISIS troops trained by the US and using US weapons?


5 posted on 01/18/2017 5:13:37 AM PST by MNGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Also, the Turkish Leopards don’t have explosive reactive armor or active protection systems to block incoming rounds...

In 2016? Is this common for tanks i this day and age not to have these capabilities


6 posted on 01/18/2017 5:15:12 AM PST by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

IIRC, Kornet was effective against our Abrams as well...

ERA is not effective against a Kornet.


7 posted on 01/18/2017 5:19:48 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

“As obsolete as cavalry against a soldier with a handheld missile.”

Leopard A4s yes. Survival time with same set of missiles (TOWs, Kornets) against Russian-made Syrian T-90s? Less than 2 seconds. Damage to T-90 = paint chips at best. Shooter damage = hard to find parts and pieces.

There’s a video somewhere on YouTube or Live Leak. Final comment after shooting Kornet at T-90, “Mufsta’s dead.”


8 posted on 01/18/2017 5:23:07 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I’m not sure how much this report really says about the leopard 2.

it has been well known tanks are vulnerable in cities and even in towns and must operate closely with dismounted infantry in order to guard against exactly the type of sudden ambush that surely led to these losses.


9 posted on 01/18/2017 5:25:18 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Tanks are not magic; they need to be supported properly. While certain groups of fighters are excellent against women and children, they are often very poor at the coordinated tactics that are needed to keep heavy equipment in a fight. When that flaw is present on both sides of a battle, the foolhardy on one side will kill off some of the heavy equipment on the other side.


10 posted on 01/18/2017 5:26:20 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Any weapon, regardless of how well designed, or how bad-*ssed, will prove vulnerable when not used as directed.
If you send tanks against enemies who outgun their protection, expect losses.
11 posted on 01/18/2017 5:27:33 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

So let me get this straight...Russia is providing air support for Turkish forces fighting ISIS in Syria.

Are the US led “allies” defending their proxies?


12 posted on 01/18/2017 5:57:13 AM PST by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

As noted by others, I’m not sure how much of this report is cause for worry. Tanks by their nature are not good in MOUT (Military Operations in Urban Terrain). Urban Terrain fighting is always messy even under the best of circumstances. Before making any assessment of this report, we would have to know more about the type of tactics and support that the Turks used during this assault. Send a tank by itself down the street and any properly equipped and trained enemy is going to ensure that it doesn’t make it to the end of that street.


13 posted on 01/18/2017 5:58:44 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Tanks have always been vulnerable in urban warfare even before the days of antitank missiles to well placed mines and guns firing at point blank range. Tanks fight best in open country.


14 posted on 01/18/2017 5:58:49 AM PST by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captain_dave
Tanks fight best in open country.

There's an interview of a WWII German Tiger tank commander moved from the Steppes of the Eastern Front to the Bocages of France.

He noticed that too. He also saw what air power, in the form of a 500lb aerial bomb does to a Tiger tank when it lands directly on top of one.

15 posted on 01/18/2017 6:11:02 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

Tanks are meant for breakthroughs and need support.
There should be smoke and artillery suppressing anyone shooting at them.


16 posted on 01/18/2017 6:46:06 AM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

Tanks are meant for breakthroughs and need support.
There should be smoke and artillery suppressing anyone shooting at them.


17 posted on 01/18/2017 6:46:09 AM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Close quarters it may not matter, but don’t the Israeli’s have what is essentially a phalanx system to take out RPG and TOW missiles?


18 posted on 01/18/2017 7:05:38 AM PST by DAC21 (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
So let me get this straight...Russia is providing air support for Turkish forces fighting ISIS in Syria.

That's what got my attention too. What a crazy, mixed up place the Obama admin has created.

19 posted on 01/18/2017 7:10:42 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Watch the missiles blow up the tanks on liveleak.

The tankers are dumb enough to park them in an exposed place, giving the missile shooter ample time to aim.


20 posted on 01/18/2017 7:22:49 AM PST by lurk (TEat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson